I try to contribute to things getting better, sometimes through polite rational skepticism.
Disagreeing with your comment ≠ supporting the opposite side, I support rationality.
Let's discuss to refine the arguments that make things better sustainably.
Always happy to question our beliefs.
It's the ML based feature to erase elements on my phone that is for some reason easier to use than basic blur.
I've read a nice book from a French skepticism popularizer trying to explain the evolutionary origin of cognitive bias, basically the bias that fucks with our logic today probably helped us survive in the past. For example, the agent detection bias makes us interpret the sound of a twig snapping in the woods as if some dangerous animal or person was tracking us. It's doesn't cost much to be wrong about it and it sucks to be eaten if it was true but you ignored it. So it's efficient to put an intention or an agent behind a random natural occurence. This could also be what religions grew from.
Lecun has massively contributed to the past decades of progress in machine learning with his fundamental research. He may have sold his soul to Meta, but his work is definitely very respected, he's not just another rich guy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqn7NTwIwmk
According to the American Museum of Natural History of New York, depending on the dinosaur species, they didn't have the same pteryx to develop a cancer.
The essence of reality is in the difference between "ser" and "estar".
C'est moyené 2002-2020, l'extrême droite est beaucoup plus présente ces dernières années, malheureusement les études de qualité ça prend du temps. À force de gagner de plus en plus de places à chaque élection, ils deviennent inévitables pour les médias qui souhaitent respecter le résultat du vote démocratique.
However, plants still absorb 90% of green light and green light holds the highest proportion of the energy radiated by the sun
Did you mean reflect?
Si ce n'est sur la place trop importante donnée aux pseudo médecines. Malheureusement la culture écolo intersecte trop souvent la culture pseudo médecines (ex: naturopathie).
I don't think this applies to the general understanding of innocent civilians indeed.
Because they were reborn there or moved by their parents.
In my main language those are often confused, so let me rephrase, which country?
I would also mention them if everyone here was not already doing that.
No, I am not defending the war crimes of Israeli army nor the ones of Hamas. Just read what I wrote, there's no more to imagine.
Which state are you talking about?
I find different sources saying about 30 children were murdered, but given that some bodies were mutilated or burnt the counts are not obvious. https://www.factcheck.org/2023/11/dozens-of-children-died-in-hamas-oct-7-attack-on-israel-contrary-to-online-claim/
I think wanting to avoid innocent civilian deaths is a moral line that is valid for both sides.
you clearly give no fucks about dead Palestinian babies.
I do. Mentioning civilian victims on Israeli an side doesn't mean I don't care about civilian victims on Palestinian side, this point was simply already covered largely.
Also please refrain from personal attacks and other violence threats.
Including people who didn't really decide on where to live, like their children?
Harmonicat