![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/088f6b5e-f4d7-4860-95d9-e1f7728d3dd3.jpeg)
Boeing used to be a fairly effective company. They had a good union and the work was largely engineer led.
The rightward turn of the 1970s eroded the union and culture. By the 2000s there was only two big players in the commercial aerospace market: Boeing and Airbus. McDonnell Douglas were limping along in a distant third place.
Boeing hoped to diversify their offerings by buying MD and using their more successful military aerospace business. MD's officers ended up gaining a lot of power in the merger and they began the process of running the firm into the ground. They went full cost cutting short term bullshit after that.
Seems a bit lib but I think there's some truth there
In a less capitalist framework, I think that would be a waste of resources in the vast majority of cases. So much of Florida is spread out. It would take a crazy amount of workers to get everything worth saving sufficiently prepared. I'd much prefer they pick a few metros to denisfy and harden. Then they can give folks in actual financial distress a pension for their trouble.
Even in a capitalist framework the upkeep costs might not be worth it passed a decade or three.
I feel like what will actually happen is the government bails out all the corporate owners of these properties and let's everyone else take the loss. Same thing they did in 2008 basically. That has the added benefit of making housing everywhere else get more expensive, due to climate refugees, so land speculators and landlords will be happy.