The conversation I meant, but I agree with adding an edit with more information
I think that’s just fair reporting
Look, can we start this over? I don’t like how this played out and I too was getting bent out of shape for what was likely good-intentions.
I’d understand if you were still upset and needed some time yet, totally fine
Lemmy is supposed to be better than Reddit culture, and be more civilized, and I feel like this was a fail here. I’d like to try again and maybe we can have some civil discourse about this if you’re up for it
No need to get bent out of shape, was just defending myself and enriching the comment section with more context.
So sorry
Because it’s better than believing an unregulated social media site that’s been proven to pedal disinformation repeatedly??
A platform owned by the richest man in the world who happens to be the son of South African apartheid?
A platform for which he removed fact checking on?
The only picture you have, you can’t even make out what’s in front of them?
Can I ask why you deleted my comment that had the Tiananmen Square Massacre copy pasta?
Where are you getting that information from?
Source?
Disinformation post ahead of election season - big shocker.
These aren’t snipers, they’re spotters. You can’t even make out what is in front of the dude in all black.
OPs only response to the closest thing we have to real fact being given was “I don’t buy it”
Seems legit. Toodles.
And now you’re deleting my posts lol. What a joke.
Apologies for the ignorant comment, while GANs have lost popularity in favor of Diffusion models, they’re still used more or less.
Been having a really shit day and I took it out on you - that wasn’t fair
If trained and written several different kinds of AI including neural nets and LLMs.
This isn’t even close to how LLMs work, let alone how AI works.
You’re literally describing how to overfit model data which is the exact opposite of what you want to do.
Do everyone else a favor next time and don’t try to armchair.
Not like this is a news community or anything
sorry for not shit posting i guess lmao
Like I’d take advice from a company known for their sexual harassment problems lmao
It’s all there’s left to do for the rich. They turn to their vices and indulge deeper and deeper, worse and worse.
What’s left to do when everyone sucks you off all the time and you can buy whatever else you want.
Affluenza is a cancer.
I’ve said this since day one - we need a reliable way to identify AI generated content
If we fail to separate the two, or create safeguards like this, we’re in a lot more trouble than the destruction of the job market would be. And that’s saying something.
“Put it back in the box” isn’t a solution.
Banning the technology isn’t a solution.
We must face it for what it is, put our heads together, and create the solution.
Like we always have.
HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO TEACH YOU THIS LESSON OLD MAN
The ocean: state of impending catastrophe
Humans: can we make another kind of cheese from them?
No difference imo
I think most would much rather screw the middleman (Subscription services, publishers, etc) pirate the material, and then send money directly to the creator if they like them.
I don’t like that these businesses can tell you that you’re gonna get something but hide the actual pertinent details like:
People have no problem buying an item as it’s marketed, but when you start fucking with and scamming/tricking consumers is when you really kick the fucking hornets nest.
I’ve also seen others mention that sometimes pirating the material meant more freedom with the content they now own a copy of. With 3rd party self hosted streaming services you can do cool things like watch stuff with your friends, watch stuff when you’re away from home, etc.
There used to be a time prior to throw away consumerism where you bought something and it was yours. You buy a painting? It’s yours to resell. Buy a record? Play it with some friends or sell that too.
A long time ago these greedy piggy middleman stepped in and started inflating with bullshit tactics like reducing your degrees of freedom with your newly owned product.
They want you to believe in this new world where you don’t get physical anything, everything’s restricted, milked until bleeding, leaving everyone wondering why everything “sucks” all of a sudden.
Cough cough, tv, movies, games rn unless made my smaller studios
I’ve got an interesting book for you!
How Music Got Free (nonfic piece about 90s-early 2000s piracy)
You’re misunderstanding the post imo
It’s not that it’s impossible to make change with non-violence/playing fair…
it’s that making change against something as violent and unfair as the system is, with non-violence and fairness, literally impossible.
The tolerant need not tolerate the intolerant.
Your chances of wining fairly against an opponent who’s allowed to cheat and change the rules of the game decrease the more your opponent wins.
Vote for who you believe in, protest against those you don’t. Hedge those bets, everyone else is.
Is there a way we could freedom of information act additional information from the police regarding body cam/an official report?
They might lie, but at least we’d have a physical ledger of lies to point to in the future?