There are several reserved names in Windows. This is for backwards compatibility with mostly DOS programs. On your desktop, try and create a folder named "con", and Windows should flat-out refuse. (Same thing for "prn", "aux" and "nul")
There are several reserved names in Windows. This is for backwards compatibility with mostly DOS programs. On your desktop, try and create a folder named "con", and Windows should flat-out refuse. (Same thing for "prn", "aux" and "nul")
Kind of a click bait title imo, in the video he concludes it's not really ready for general use. Id argue that's not going mainstream.
If you ensured both the subdomain and the domain name were provided when using certbot, then it could be a case where the server is still using a previous cert. I had issues where changing the cert in NameCheap did not immediately take affect. (In the NameCheap CPanel console, cert would be fine, but actually visiting the site would still present the old cert for a while.) There were at least a couple times where it only presented the new cert after I fully removed the old one from Cpanel. Other than that, running out of ideas.
Sounds like the cert is missing a required SAN name. I used namecheap and Let's Encrypt together before. I had to ensure that *.ziviz.us
and ziviz.us
were both provided to certbot. I used manual DNS challenges, and it looked like this:
certbot certonly --manual --preferred-challenges dns
Saving debug log to /var/log/letsencrypt/letsencrypt.log
Please enter the domain name(s) you would like on your certificate (comma and/or
space separated) (Enter 'c' to cancel): ziviz.us *.ziviz.us
Definitely this. The data is not likely gone, but before doing anything that could make things worse, try and get a full copy of the SD card somewhere. From there you may safely try repairing the partition or data carving tools.
Seems right to me. I thought maybe it was fixed in the time since the comment but the cert looks like it was issued at the start of the month.
*removed externally hosted image*
For those, like me, that just wanted to see Pokemon Company's statement
We have received many inquiries regarding another company’s game released in January 2024. We have not granted any permission for the use of Pokémon intellectual property or assets in that game. We intend to investigate and take appropriate measures to address any acts that infringe on intellectual property rights related to the Pokémon. We will continue to cherish and nurture each and every Pokémon and its world, and work to bring the world together through Pokémon in the future.
The Pokémon Company
I don't personally know of any but in a similar vein there are some stone monuments intended to convey information after an apocalypse like the Georgia Guidestones or the nuclear waste site warning stones. GitHub put a snapshot of all active code repositories from 2020 in arctic permafrost, and there is the arctic seed vault for preserving plant species.
If you are on browser using unlock origin, you can use custom cosmetic filters like sh.itjust.works##div.post-listing:has-text(/hexbear.net/)
. Not perfect and does not hide comments, but I've been happy enough with just this.
The argument also falls apart when the same stuff is evidently cheaper, but still profitable, when for fish.
A fundamental flaw in this, is it still involves user data, even if "anonymized". You can advertise without any user data. We do it all the time. Does a television channel know your gender? Does a radio station know if you bought a car recently? Does the newspaper know your hobbies?