:azan:

Though he did clarify they don't have a worse police state than the US. He just both-sides it.

Edit - It's a law of hexbear that every discussion must turn into a struggle session. Especially if the discussion involves China.

  • garbage [none/use name,he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    no.

    modern police are an invention of capitalism. they serve to protect private property. a proletarian state doesn't have private property, and there would be no need to have a gang to protect it.

    it sucks that china adopted the idea in the first place, and hopefully as they grow towards socialism they'll start to phase it out and replace it with something more inline with a community neighborhood watch.

    • Huldra [they/them, it/its]
      ·
      4 years ago

      To me this just sounds like deciding that the term police has a fixed absolute definition and that you have to change the name to something more complicated to make it good and acceptable under communism, theres no reason you can't just have a socialist/communist police force thats different from bourgeoise police forces, also theres the fact that a neighboorhood watch, while good for most crimes, is limited in scope and ability and theres still gonna be a use and need for an overarching force that can handle specialized issues and crimes that span more than just a community.

      • garbage [none/use name,he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        it's not changing the fucking name, it's literal replacement with something better. when people call to 'abolish the police' they call to abolish the fucked up system of an armed group of thugs that have impunity to law. cuba has 8 million people in their fucking neighborhood watch, and yes they still have a smaller force that handles specialized issues, but the fact that 80 percent of their population takes place in their neighborhood watch is what keeps their country the way it is, and is far more aligned with the idea of communism than having anything comparable to the police in the US.

    • StLangoustine [any]
      ·
      4 years ago

      a proletarian state doesn’t have private property, and there would be no need to have a gang to protect it

      Proletarian state can still have things that are in short supply that should be distributed according to the principles of common proletarian good. Some asshole stealing communal property might be less the ideal.

      There are also non-property crimes, like crimes of passion and shit.

      • Huldra [they/them, it/its]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Yeah, a neighborhood watch isn't gonna be able to solve certain shit like a serial killer going around multiple places like Chikatilo, simply because you can't equip every neighborhood watch with extensive education in spotting patterns and building a profile, nor can you equip them all with forensic laboratories to analyse evidence(In theory you could but it's far less effective than having specialized forces who cover much larger areas but less overall crimes).