• wrecker_vs_dracula [comrade/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Rock and Rollers figured out they could make twice the money if they held writing credits. Boomers then became obsessed with the "authenticity" of the band that writes its own material. We could live in a world where poetry is free and we share many songs.

    • CommunistShoplifter [none/use name]
      ·
      3 years ago

      These days pop artists pay “proven hit makers” who use the common pop song chords on everything to write their songs and then change some of the lyrics to get a writing credit and thus a higher cut of the song royalties.

      thats why songwriters have developed a saying about this practice “change a word, get a third”

      • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
        ·
        3 years ago

        At least for a while, blatant referentiality and riff stealing is a cornerstone of modern punk. Not a complaint, it's been part of the territory since the 90s. There's an entire subgenre dedicated to kinda sounding like Discharge.

        • Grownbravy [they/them]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Yeah, it makes for a stale scene at times too. Especially when an artist threatens musical exploration

          • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
            ·
            3 years ago

            Eh, I'd that's what I cared about I'd listen to prog. Punk bands that try to evolve musically almost always end out awful.

    • CommunistShoplifter [none/use name]
      ·
      3 years ago

      also I have an interview with Bret Easton Ellis somewhere in my archive where he talks about the idea of “art being free” and anyone being able to write, publish and even perform whether they have an education or not (he’s talking specifically about the alt-lit scene and punk) and he gets really angry about it, saying “as if thats anything but a terrible thing”