Elon Musk opened my eyes. I can't believe I'm saying this, but I'm invested into Cumrocket. Not just because of Elon, he just shown me the reasons why it could moon. Pornhub being one of the most trafficked websites, sex sells. This has huge potential
Speaking of trafficking...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MindGeek#Hosting_non-consensual_pornography
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MindGeek#Hosting_child_sexual_abuse_material_of_child_sex_trafficking_victims
the subreddit is full of worthless kulak grifters whose only praxis is upvoting things to raise attention to their rape finance bubble.
https://www.reddit.com/r/CumRocket/comments/nqjo5z/please_make_sure_youre_completing_all_of_these/
the attempted smear campaign is pretty funny. what a pitiful attempt at deploying resources at trying to bring other projects down, instead of actually building something useful themselves
Sir, you are supporting infrastructure to exploit sex slaves :epstein:
Right now, if I want to spend money on porn, I have to spend USD. In the future, I may also have the option of spending USD on $Cummies and spending those $Cummies on porn instead. Making this option available will somehow cause irreversible environmental damage
One might ask "Why would I go through an extra step to buy porn?"
Well, if I buy porn now, it'll show up on my credit card statement and MY WIFE will see it. In the future, she'll only be able to see that I'm spending money on $Cummies.
(This is the unironic technological benefit that people are touting. I'm not kidding)
Well the market on machine that pollutes to produce money is pretty saturated so clearly someone had to innovate it into machine that pollutes to produce sex crimes that produce money
I think this is Elon trying to create demand for spacex because I sure as fuck don't want to live on this planet anymore.
Help me think through allegations that PH is a child pornography and rape farm? Call me ignorant but I really don't see the difference between them and YouTube, imgur or Hexbear. Can't all of these hosting services end up having illegal content uploaded, and assuming the hosting service deletes them when they find out shouldn't emphasis be on finding those that upload it?
I don't know, I've really only seen SWERFs use the line that PH is bad because they host child pornography. I'm happy to be proven wrong of course, I guess I just don't see it.
(I'm defending PH in anything here btw, this is a genuine line of questioning)
I think they previously allowed non-consensual uploads (unapproved by one of the parties), and removing them was kinda a hard process, but I thought they changed to only verified accounts. Obv that doesn’t include material conditions of porn companies exploitation of their workers, so kinda meh.
Re:YouTube I think it would be if some creator was producing all his videos on fiverr, only worse, there is some ghastly exploitation here.
I thought they changed to only verified accounts
They only did this because they're trying to get back into Visa and Mastercard's good graces, who dropped them a few months ago. Because of all the child pornography and the rape. Which Pornhub knew about for years, but did nothing to act on until their bottom line was affected.
Is that the standard, criminal record checks for all posters? If they don't and somebody uploads illegal content that the hosts remove the hosts are liable?
Why is there a different standard for PH compared to other hosting sites?
