Because I see a lot more of it from (online) baby leftist Western anarchists. Specifically, an outright opposition to others' anti-imperialist action, effectively becoming domestic CIA assets.
Annoying baby (online) MLs are less harmful and are simply rarer. I think this is partly because most MLs people don't go straight from lib to ML.
If we want to build a pipeline towards solidarity and praxis by those in the imperial core - i.e., those who have nearly always disappointed and hav let themselves be coopted - we need to recognize our pipeline deficits so that we can strategize on how to address them.
Have you joined many ML groups?
Edit: upon re-reading, the answer is definitely no. So where did you get your generalization from?
deleted by creator
But MLs and anarchists do the same direct action online: virtually nothing.
deleted by creator
I don't see why that makes sense. They do other things online.
deleted by creator
Because I see a lot more of it from (online) baby leftist Western anarchists. Specifically, an outright opposition to others' anti-imperialist action, effectively becoming domestic CIA assets.
Annoying baby (online) MLs are less harmful and are simply rarer. I think this is partly because most MLs people don't go straight from lib to ML.
If we want to build a pipeline towards solidarity and praxis by those in the imperial core - i.e., those who have nearly always disappointed and hav let themselves be coopted - we need to recognize our pipeline deficits so that we can strategize on how to address them.
deleted by creator
Think I found the problem
Bruh lmao