The unfortunate reality is that we'd have to let them go extinct, not force them to be extinct, but they are not genetically predisposed to surviving in the wild, and even if they were, just releasing billions of large grazing mammals would destroy entire ecosystems.
Ideally we could relinquish some of our human cities back to the wild to create a sanctuary for them, but that's a wild ideal to imagine.
Okay, what if we genetically mutated human lives to the point where they can't survive outside of a certain environment with a certain degree of "care"?
The unfortunate reality is that we'd have to let them go extinct, not force them to be extinct, but they are not genetically predisposed to surviving in the wild, and even if they were, just releasing billions of large grazing mammals would destroy entire ecosystems.
Ideally we could relinquish some of our human cities back to the wild to create a sanctuary for them, but that's a wild ideal to imagine.
Seems inconsistent with the idea that animal lives matter as much as human lives.
deleted by creator
Reminds me of this: https://hexbear.net/post/118052
deleted by creator
I don't think anybody was suggesting that you or anyone artificially inanimate anything in that hypothetical future. It's a weird argument to make.
deleted by creator
:doubt:
Cows fuck.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Okay, what if we genetically mutated human lives to the point where they can't survive outside of a certain environment with a certain degree of "care"?
deleted by creator
So what's the other option then?
This exchange is frankly hilarious.
deleted by creator
That would be the ideal, if we can provide them enough territory that doesn't destroy other ecosystems.