• Judge_Juche [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    A Senator is going to whisper the word "filibuster" and the Dems will throw up up their hands and give up immediately.

  • Futterbinger [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Now, I might be wrong, but if Row v. Wade is codified into law doesn't that give the supreme court, that just ruled in favor of abortion restriction, the option to declare it unconstitutional at the first possible opportunity?

    • SerLava [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      If the Democrats had any fucking courage, which they do not, they could literally disallow the supreme court from ruling on their law. It's called "jurisdiction stripping" and they can just do it.

    • inshallah2 [none/use name]
      hexagon
      ·
      3 years ago

      It would be pretty funny if the dems make a Herculean effort to get through the senate, it passes, Biden signs it, Biden gives a big, "important" speech right after, and the very next day the GOP justices call it unconstitutional via the shadow docket.

      The only solution here that's actually sane is that Biden and the dems pack the court. But of course - they'll never, ever do that.

    • emizeko [they/them]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Row v. Wade

      landmark legal case that decided how to cross the river

  • kristina [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    how have we never codified roe v wade its been like 50 years

    • emizeko [they/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      Since the emancipation of the Negroes, the distinction between the two parties has been diminishing. The fight between these two parties has been mainly over the height of customs duties. Their fight has not had any serious importance for the mass of the people. The people have been deceived and diverted from their vital interests by means of spectacular and meaningless duels between the two bourgeois parties.

      -Lenin, The Results and Significance of the U.S. Presidential Elections, 1912

    • Crucible [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Much more profitable for both sides if they just fight over it every election

  • tails__miles_prower [none/use name]
    ·
    3 years ago

    How pathetic we've come. When I think doing something in 3 weeks isnt as bad as I thought. They've been so performative lately. I swear I thought they were going to put pillows under there shirts as some form of artificial support and call it a day.

    • Alex_Jones [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Has Biden said anything about it? I know he had a shitty record before inauguration, but I'm wondering where he's standing on this.

      You'd think he'd do something to appease the liberals mad about Afghanistan.

  • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]
    ·
    3 years ago

    My prediction is that the democrats will not wield state power on behalf of people seeking a more just world. Instead, they'll abdicate their power to a handful of large corporations with a presence in Texas. This law will probably be overturned, but it'll be when a company like Lockheed Martin threatens to move a large office to another state, citing difficulties with hiring.

    • inshallah2 [none/use name]
      hexagon
      ·
      3 years ago

      it’ll be when a company like...

      I hadn't thought of that. And now that I'm considering it - that might be the only way the dems actually start to fight.

      This hurts business...

      • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        It'll be like Coca-Cola fighting for voting rights in Georgia, as long as you're not voting to join a union.

        These companies do the state's job, and gradually they've become the state.... or at least that's how it appears to me.

  • necrocop [he/him,any]
    ·
    3 years ago

    She looks straight up like Death. The sunken dead eyes that say she’s been taking the souls of human beings for millennia.

  • cawsby [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Only thing that will save reproductive rights long term is a constitutional amendment.

  • emizeko [they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    [sarcastically] just hold the baby another month, ladies, what's the problem!?!!!1!?