Bhagat Singh was born on 27 September 1907.
Indian revolutionary and a major figure in the Indian independence movement of the early Twentieth Century. Singh was active in revolutionary struggle from an early age and he was briefly affiliated with the Mohandas Ghandi’s “Non-Cooperation” movement, although Singh would break with Ghandi’s philosophy of non-violent resistance later in life.
Singh embraced atheism and Marxism-Leninism and integrated these key components into his philosophy of revolutionary struggle. Under his leadership, the Kirti Kissan Party was renamed the Hindustan Socialist Republican Organization. As Singh and his organization rose to new prominence in the Indian independence movement, they became the focus of public criticism from Ghandi himself, who disagreed with their belief that violence was a necessary and vital component of revolutionary struggle.
Singh’s secularism was perhaps his most important contribution to the socialist and independence struggles. During those turbulent times, British Imperialism used every tactic to create antagonism among the different religions of India, especially between Hindus and Muslims. The Sanghatan and Shuddi Movements among Hindus; and tableegh and many sectarian movements in Muslims bear witness to the effects of this tactic. Bhagat Singh removed his beard which was a violation of Sikh religion, because he did not want to create before the public the image of a ‘Sikh’ freedom fighter. Nor did he want to be held up as a hero by the followers of this religion. He wanted to teach the people that British Imperialism was their common enemy and they must be united against it to win freedom.
On April 8, 1924, Baghat Singh and his compatriot B. K. Dutt hurled two bombs on to the floor of the Central Delhi Hall in New Delhi. The bombs were tossed away from individuals so as not to harm anyone and, in fact, no one was harmed in the ensuing explosions. Following the explosions, Singh and Dutt showered the hall with copies of a leaflet that later was to be known as “The Red Pamphlet.” The pamphlet began with a passage which was to become legendary in the Indian revolutionary struggle:
“It takes a loud voice to make the deaf hear, with these immortal words uttered on a similar occasion by Vaillant, a French anarchist martyr, do we strongly justify this action of ours.”
Singh and Dutt concluded the pamphlet with the phrase “Long Live the Revolution!” This phrase (translated from “Inquilab Zindabad!” became one of the most enduring slogans of the Indian Independence Movement.
Singh and Dutt turned themselves in following the bombing incident. Following the trial, they were sentenced to “transportation for life” and while imprisoned, Singh and Dutt became outspoken critics of the Indian penal system, embarking on hunger strikes and engaging in agitation and propaganda from within the confines of the prison. Shortly after the commencement of his prison sentence, Singh was implicated in the 1928 death of a Deputy Police Superintendent. Singh acknowledged involvement in the death and he was executed by hanging on 23 March 1931.
Bhagat Singh is widely hailed as a martyr as a result of his execution at the hands of oppressors and, as such, he is often referred to as “Shaheed (Martyr) Bhagat Singh.”
Comprehensive list of resources for those in need of an abortion :feminism:
Resources for Palestine :palestine-heart:
Here are some resourses on Prison Abolition :brick-police:
Foundations of Leninism :USSR:
:lenin-shining: :unity: :kropotkin-shining:
Anarchism and Other Essays :ancom:
Remember, sort by new you :LIB:
Follow the Hexbear twitter account :comrade-birdie:
THEORY; it’s good for what ails you (all kinds of tendencies inside!) :RIchard-D-Wolff:
COMMUNITY CALENDAR - AN EXPERIMENT IN PROMOTING USER ORGANIZING EFFORTS :af:
Come listen to music with your fellow Hexbears in Cy.tube :og-hex-bear:
Queer stuff? Come talk in the Queer version of the megathread ! :sicko-queer:
Monthly Neurodiverse Megathread and Monthly ND Venting Thread :Care-Comrade:
Join the fresh and beautiful batch of new comms:
!labour@hexbear.net :iww:
!emoji@hexbear.net :meow-anarchist: :meow-tankie:
!libre@hexbear.net :libretion:
Wmill's Moscow problems :putin-wink:
So one winner for the weekend and it's comrade @LeninWeave so :rat-salute:.
Previous answer
According to the will, the son gets 2/3, the daughter gets 1/3, and on average the widow gets 1.5/3 ([1/3+2/3]/2). That's a total of 4.5/3, so the new denominator should be 4.5, or 9 for an integer. To keep it close to the will, I'd give the son 4/9, the daughter 2/9, and the widow 3/9.
The alarm clock
An alarm clock runs 4 minutes slow every hour. It was set right 3 1/2 hours ago. Now another clock, which is correct, shows noon.
In how many minutes, to the nearest minute, will the alarm clock show noon?
Like usual have fun :soviet-heart: and remember to dm @Wmill the answer.
The Collegue papers saga has ended for now, the Study Saga Begins Now :soviet-huff:
Professor characterizing the Gracchi brothers as being "violators of Rome's constitutional norms" what a lib :disgost:
He can suck my toes. The first ones to draw blood on that front were the men of the Senate resorting to violence and subversion of the office of Tribune, which was supposedly inviolate.
"Waaah Tiberius was rude when he proposed the Lex Sempriona Agraria". The senators were literally in violation of existing agrarian laws at the time, the Lex Sempriona Agraria was a milder version of existing laws, the senators were just mad someone could actually enforce the law on them.
"WAAAAH. BUT THE LAW IS ONLY SUPPOSED TO APPLY TO PLEBS".
deleted by creator
Another one to my reading list, thanks
(It's not a good book)
Oh :sadness:
It gets a lot of praise on the left by people who haven't read a lot of Roman history because the premise is super dope ("What if Caesar was fucking Lenin or some shit"), but in order to reach that conclusion it engages in absurd leaps of logic, disgustingly selective readings of sources, and most fun of all just declares entire understood biographies fictional if they don't conform to the narrative.
Doesn't sound that good then, never mind on reading that
Mike Duncan (author of the Revolutions Podcast) also recorded a 150+ episode podcast titled The History of Rome, which was pretty good.
Parentis book is not good actually.
you gotta wonder if perhaps some kind of crisis coming in from outside of the legislative body would cause someone to violate some norms
He didn't violate shit. The licinian laws had been passed decades prior, and the concilium plebis was a perfectly legal way to pass laws.
It might have been a bit rude to have Octavius thrown from the room, but he was fucking bought by the senate which was super illegal. ( And also he was being a complete dick "Lol I'll veto anything you do today, can't do shit. Lol. What are you going to do vote to remove me? I'll just veto that too lol. )