Inejiro Asanuma (浅沼 稲次郎, Asanuma Inejirō, 27 December 1898 – 12 October 1960) was a Japanese politician and leader of the Japan Socialist Party. Asanuma became a forceful advocate of socialism in post-war Japan. He was noted for his support of the Chinese Communist Party, and his criticism of U.S–Japanese relations, which were particularly controversial.

Asanuma was born on the island of Miyake-jima, a remote volcanic island that is administratively part of Tokyo, on 27 December 1898.[2] His mother died during his birth, leaving him to be raised by his father, who later died of cancer at the age of 42.

He served in the Diet from 1936. He grew dissatisfied with the direction World War II was taking and withdrew his candidacy from the 1942 election and retired from politics until after Japan's defeat. He later returned to politics as a socialist and left-wing activist.

Asanuma was widely criticized for a 1959 incident in which he visited Communist China and called the United States "the shared enemy of China and Japan" during a speech in Beijing. When he returned from this trip he wore a Mao suit while disembarking from a plane in Japan, sparking criticism even from Socialist leaders.

Asanuma was assassinated with a wakizashi, a traditional short sword, by ultranationalist Otoya Yamaguchi while speaking in a televised political debate in Tokyo. His violent death was seen in graphic detail on national television, causing widespread public shock and outrage.

The Japan Socialist Party had been an unhappy marriage between far left socialists, centrist socialists, and right socialists, who had been forced together in order to oppose the consolidation of conservative parties into the Liberal Democratic Party in 1955. Asanuma had been a charismatic figure who had been able to hold many of these mutually antagonistic factions together through the force of his personality. Under Asanuma's leadership, the party had won an increasing amount of seats in the Diet in every election over the latter half of the 1950s and seemed to be gathering momentum.

Asanuma's untimely death deprived the party of his adroit leadership, and thrust Saburō Eda into the leadership role instead. A centrist, Eda rapidly took the party in a more centrist direction, far faster than the left socialists were ready to accept. This led to growing infighting within the party, and drastically damaged its ability to present a cohesive message to the public. Over the rest of the 1960s and going forward, the number of seats the Socialists held in the Diet continued to decline until the party's extinction in 1996.

Japan Socialist Party

The Japan Socialist Party (日本社会党, Nihon Shakai Tō), also known as the JSP, was a socialist political party in Japan that existed from 1945 to 1996. The party was founded by members of several former proletarian parties that existed before World War II, including the Social Mass Party, the Labour-Farmer Party, and the Japan Labour-Farmer Party.

The JSP was briefly in power from 1947 to 1948. From 1951 to 1955, the JSP was divided into the Left Socialist Party and the Right Socialist Party . In the same year, the two major conservative parties in Japan merged to form the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which established the 1955 System, and allowing the LDP to continuously hold power. The JSP was the largest opposition party but was incapable of forming a government. Nonetheless, the JSP managed to hold about one third of the seats in the National Diet during this period, preventing the LDP from revising the Constitution of Japan.

In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the JSP under the leadership of Takako Doi earned a record-high number of seats. Shocked by the establishment of new conservative parties, the party's seats in the National Diet decreased significantly in the mid-1990s, and the JSP was dissolved in 1996. Its successor is the Social Democratic Party , a minor party only holding four representatives in the National Diet as of 2020. There have been two JSP Prime Ministers of Japan, Tetsu Katayama and Tomiichi Murayama.

Comprehensive list of resources for those in need of an abortion :feminism:

Resources for Palestine :palestine-heart:

Here are some resourses on Prison Abolition :brick-police:

Foundations of Leninism :USSR:

:lenin-shining: :unity: :kropotkin-shining:

Anarchism and Other Essays :ancom:

Remember, sort by new you :LIB:

Follow the Hexbear twitter account :comrade-birdie:

THEORY; it’s good for what ails you (all kinds of tendencies inside!) :RIchard-D-Wolff:

COMMUNITY CALENDAR - AN EXPERIMENT IN PROMOTING USER ORGANIZING EFFORTS :af:

Come listen to music with your fellow Hexbears in Cy.tube :og-hex-bear:

Queer stuff? Come talk in the Queer version of the megathread ! :sicko-queer:

Monthly Neurodiverse Megathread and Monthly ND Venting Thread :Care-Comrade:

Join the fresh and beautiful batch of new comms:

!labour@hexbear.net :iww:

!emoji@hexbear.net :meow-anarchist: :meow-tankie:

!libre@hexbear.net :libretion:

Wmill's Moscow Problems :cyber-lenin:

So no winners but that's okay. We got a late winner @SteamedHamberder

Previous answer

Sawing 2-yard logs produces a number of 1/2-yard logs divisible by 4; sawing 1 1/2-yard logs, divisible by 3; 1-yard logs, divisible by 2. Pastukhov's team 27 logs is not divisible by 2 or 4, so it is the 1 1/2-yard log team of Petya Kostya. The team leader is Petya Galkin, so Patsukhov's first name is Kostya.

A test of divisibility by 3, 7, and 19

The product of the prime numbers 3, 7, and 19 is 399. If a number 100a + b (where b is a two-digit number and a is any positive integer) is divisible by 399 or by any of its divisors, then a + 4b is divisible by the same number.

On your own, can you prove this? (Hint: Use 400a + 4b as a link.) Can you formulate and prove its converse?

Devise a simple test of divisibility by 3, 7, and 19.

Like usual have fun :soviet-heart: and remember to dm @Wmill the answer.

i wrote the hoxha post in apeoplescalendar, and today i noticed that now it has an extra paragraph saying how he was doing evil state repression and personality cult stuff, and this comes from a US gov comission book. :thinkin-lenin: dem sucs at apc doing cringe again

  • WhoaSlowDownMaurice [they/them, undecided]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Remembering the time one of my brothers claimed that, as a diabetic, he would actually be worse off in the USSR compared to the US because he'd be forced to eat nothing but potatoes because that's all they had to eat, obviously. Whereas in the US, he says, market innovation created insulin and "I'm able to live normally thanks to that invention" didn't fucking care about all the other diabetics who die due to not being able afford insulin, of course.

    • thethirdgracchi [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Damn this is wrong in so many different ways. First, insulin was created by researchers who did not have any profit incentive, and even sold the patent for $1 to a university because they felt it was unethical to profit off of a life saving drug!!! Second, the USSR had fucking insulin and unlike the United States it was free for all and produced by the state because they had universal healthcare! Third, according to the CIA itself as of 1983 Soviet citizens had a better diet than Americans!

      • WhoaSlowDownMaurice [they/them, undecided]
        ·
        3 years ago

        All true, all true! Of course, when I pointed that out to him, I was just "repeating propaganda" :agony-shivering:

        Of course, this same brother also legit believed that all billionaires worked harder than everyone else for every dollar they have

    • Rem [she/her]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Don't they have insulin in like... every country?

      • WhoaSlowDownMaurice [they/them, undecided]
        ·
        3 years ago

        Yes. But don't you see, every person in the Soviet Union was a hardscrabble dirt and potato farmer being pushed around by mean secret police! Also same guy once claimed that the reason "everyone was poor" in the USSR was because "they spent all their money on their military"