• ssjmarx [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      He ends up kind of landing on "China made mistakes and then retreated a bit from their initial victories - but don't confuse that with failure, and don't confuse the heights they've reached with victory, since the revolutionary process by its nature requires a lot of failing and starting over", and as the other poster said that's just one aspect of the piece.

      It's a good read.

    • Abraxiel
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      Dare to think a little more complexly. This is really broader than China. And if any criticism of China is permissible, this is a great example of exploring where its policy and actions fit within the engine of history and what they might produce.

    • Ectrayn [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      No, and surprisingly clear and to the point given that it's Žižek. I found it very interesting, with good ideas to explore