“Disloyal weapon” implies that while Graeber’s rhetoric is effective, it’s ultimately what hurts his argument. Reads to me like “you don’t know what you’re really asking for”
I mean, I kind of thought that or along the same lines of reasoning - but really, that's a stretch. It's closer to word salad than some logical conjunction of two words. It's not effective, regardless.
Doesn't matter. The dude's a complete fuckhead one way or the other.
“Disloyal weapon” implies that while Graeber’s rhetoric is effective, it’s ultimately what hurts his argument. Reads to me like “you don’t know what you’re really asking for”
I mean, I kind of thought that or along the same lines of reasoning - but really, that's a stretch. It's closer to word salad than some logical conjunction of two words. It's not effective, regardless.
Doesn't matter. The dude's a complete fuckhead one way or the other.