Sec. 7. Banning Chokeholds and Carotid Restraints
(a) The heads of Federal LEAs shall... ensure that their respective agencies issue policies with requirements... generally prohibits the use of chokeholds and carotid restraints except where the use of deadly force is authorized by law.
Forbids police from no-knock warrants
Sec. 10. Restricting No-Knock Entries.
(b) The heads of Federal LEAs shall maintain records of no-knock entries.
Forbids police from purchasing military-only equipment
(c) Prior to transferring any property included in the “controlled equipment list”... ensure that the recipient State, Tribal, local, or territorial LEA:
(iv) agrees to return the property if... the LEA has engaged in a pattern or practice of civil rights violations.
HexFact rating? 5/5 Pinocchios
[There is more guff in the order but I've included only what's needed to dispute the claims]
Yes, on the chokehold language. EOs cannot establish or change law, only congress can do that. EO can only affirm existing law, which is exactly what that EO does. All EOs are total BS, always have been. They are media rallying points for low information voters to serve the purposes of propaganda.
Sec. 7. Banning Chokeholds and Carotid Restraints (a) The heads of Federal LEAs shall... ensure that their respective agencies issue policies with requirements... generally prohibits the use of chokeholds and carotid restraints except where the use of deadly force is authorized by law.
Sec. 10. Restricting No-Knock Entries.
(b) The heads of Federal LEAs shall maintain records of no-knock entries.
(c) Prior to transferring any property included in the “controlled equipment list”... ensure that the recipient State, Tribal, local, or territorial LEA:
(iv) agrees to return the property if... the LEA has engaged in a pattern or practice of civil rights violations.
HexFact rating? 5/5 Pinocchios
[There is more guff in the order but I've included only what's needed to dispute the claims]
We also have
:pinocchio-left::pinocchio-middle::pinocchio-middle::pinocchio-right:
Comrades we are truly living in an emoji utopia
Yes, on the chokehold language. EOs cannot establish or change law, only congress can do that. EO can only affirm existing law, which is exactly what that EO does. All EOs are total BS, always have been. They are media rallying points for low information voters to serve the purposes of propaganda.
Wait, so the law literally says, "illegal except when legal"? LMFAAAAAAAAAO!