:gulag:

  • riley
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • CrimsonSage [any]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Yes because the coordination and frameworks that NATO creates dont have wider implications for geopolitics in general... fuckin brainlet.

      • sysgen [none/use name,they/them]
        ·
        3 years ago

        You see organisations are just the sum of their members, except when they arent, which is why they are better than the sum of their members. Yes.

    • Tofu_Lewis [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Literally the first sentence of the (CIA)wikipedia article on it:

      On 19 March 2011, a multi-state NATO-led coalition began a military intervention in Libya, to implement United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973, in response to events during the First Libyan Civil War.

    • Huldra [they/them, it/its]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Oh so its just liberal mysticism of magically divorcing the alliance of countries from the countries themselves, that its somehow more virtuous than the sum of its parts?

    • Glass [he/him,they/them]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Right, like how its not a police death squad because the pigs were off duty when they did the killing