do they think making the yearly sub outrageously expensive is gonna make me “these idiots don’t know it’s cheaper to do it by month!” and pay for this stupid bs
You must log in or # to comment.
Imagine forgetting to cancel and getting charged $415 a year to read Bloomberg
not bloomberg but I've cancelled subscriptions and had the company just charge to renew anyways, these type of subscription models are extremely predatory
For me it's either $0.25 per week, $5 per month, or $290 per year lmao
This is designed to make bazinga brains go "haha, you foooools! you've screwed up the numbers and I'll take advantage of you!" and buy an ongoing monthly subscription to feel /le superiority/
hmm i think i'll just view the web-archived articles like i always do lmao
