• smegforbrains@lemmy.ml
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don't want to have an argument: I want to have a discussion with arguments offered, sources cited and less logical fallacies and personal attacks.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
          hexagon
          ·
          11 months ago

          You keep responding because you're perseverating as evidenced by you regurgitating the same phrases over and over long after they have ceased to be socially relevant or appropriate.

          • smegforbrains@lemmy.ml
            ·
            11 months ago

            That's evasion again. Please try supporting your arguments with credible sources or arguments next time.

                  • smegforbrains@lemmy.ml
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    Come on now. I'm sure that anyone who can keep the overview over all the brackets in a line of Lisp code, has the mental capacity to engage in a civil discussion, offer arguments to support their view and cite credible sources. So let's try again. My argument is as follows:

                    As long as there is no adequate long term storage facility for nuclear waste, we should not produce more nuclear waste

                    What's your antithesis?