• Slaanesh [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    What would voting for the dems this year do in relation to Roe v Wade? The dems have the power to stop it. They have had the power to protect abortion rights for decades. Why would they do anything different now.

    All these analysts have said the conservitives wouldn't actually go through overturning it because it's a great wedge issue. But again the ball is in their court "My leftist opponent would legalize abortions!".

    • eduardog3000 [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      3 years ago

      What would voting for the dems this year do in relation to Roe v Wade? The dems have the power to stop it.

      "B-but Manchin and Sinema. We just need a couple more senators, then we can fix things for sure."

      • Slaanesh [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        More boss babes in cute skirts! Libs are now calling for sanctions against red states. That'll forsure help the People facing the brunt of this ruling.

        Seriously, if anyone here is affected and can get to Canada easily. You have a free place to stay, with health clinics nearby.

        • ugly_disabled_cishet [none/use name]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Libs are now calling for sanctions against red states.

          It really is too bad that libs don't carry little pocket constitutions with them, otherwise they would have heard about a little Import-Export Clause that makes this difficult to impossible. Why are Americans so in love with passing performative, anti-constitutional laws?

          • LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA [he/him]
            ·
            3 years ago

            Why are Americans so in love with passing performative, anti-constitutional laws?

            Because that's what the constitution itself always was

      • Neckbeard_Prime [they/them,he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        :maybe-later-kiddo: Sorry, sweaty, the Senate Parliamentarian says we can't legislate Federal-level reproductive rights!

    • GreatWhiteNope [she/her]
      ·
      3 years ago

      The lib argument would be that if we can get a dem supermajority, they could codify it into law.

      This assumes that 60 democratic senators would vote to guarantee abortion as a right and that the Supreme Court would not overturn the law.

      It’s true that they could have done this in 2008, but maybe Roe actually being overturned would make them feel it’s necessary now.

      So lots of wishful thinking essentially.

      • Slaanesh [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        It was a political move to not codify it into law. And if they gave a shit it would have been a bad move not to do so. Now they need to either put the issue aside or run on pro abortion rights. Neither is politically beneficial to them. Dems continue to be their own worst enemy.