Do I have to keep having to say the same thing on the same topic every four to six months?
No the American Revolution was not a communist Revolution, it was a bougeoise Revolution. Stop watching youtube debatebros and go read a fucking history book you dumb hog.
No the American Revolution was not a counter-revolution, thats lib-brain historical revisionism. Major communist figures acknowledged the progressive role of the founding fathers in history in their revolt against late-stage feudalism as it was an advance of society from an older more reactionary stage of development.
No the literal British Empire, the empire that started the international slave trade, implemented it in America, and held all its colonial subjects in all-but-name slavery, was not more progressive than a bunch of Yankee hick slave owning merchants.
No, the founding fathers did not primarily start their revolution because they wanted to keep their slaves or because they wanted to keep expanding colonial borders. Those were a portion of the material reasons they fought. Their development of a national character independent of the British people in conjuction to the undemocratic British aristocratic system and the Yankees objections to being used as proxy to help fight the British wars played a stronger role in the reason for their secession.
No, just because it was initially progressive does not mean it continued being progressive.
No, just because it's concidered a progressive Revolution means you should necessarily uphold it as a goal. Merely acknowledging its place in history is enough.
Yes I know the French Revolution was more based because of the choppy choppy.
Yes America sucks. It sucks less that the fucking British. That was true then and its still true now :british-maw:
Do I have to keep having to say the same thing on the same topic every four to six months?
No the American Revolution was not a communist Revolution, it was a bougeoise Revolution. Stop watching youtube debatebros and go read a fucking history book you dumb hog.
No the American Revolution was not a counter-revolution, thats lib-brain historical revisionism. Major communist figures acknowledged the progressive role of the founding fathers in history in their revolt against late-stage feudalism as it was an advance of society from an older more reactionary stage of development.
No the literal British Empire, the empire that started the international slave trade, implemented it in America, and held all its colonial subjects in all-but-name slavery, was not more progressive than a bunch of Yankee hick slave owning merchants.
No, the founding fathers did not primarily start their revolution because they wanted to keep their slaves or because they wanted to keep expanding colonial borders. Those were a portion of the material reasons they fought. Their development of a national character independent of the British people in conjuction to the undemocratic British aristocratic system and the Yankees objections to being used as proxy to help fight the British wars played a stronger role in the reason for their secession.
No, just because it was initially progressive does not mean it continued being progressive.
No, just because it's concidered a progressive Revolution means you should necessarily uphold it as a goal. Merely acknowledging its place in history is enough.
Yes I know the French Revolution was more based because of the choppy choppy.
Yes America sucks. It sucks less that the fucking British. That was true then and its still true now :british-maw:
Happy America sucks and fuck the British day.
deleted by creator
U wot m8