This is a blatant rejection of the concerns of intersectionality. This helps no one. I don't entirely understand what OP's spiel is getting at, but to think that you can entirely separate class from your identity in regards to things like gender, race, and sexuality is nonsense and a gross oversimplification that eschews real-world concerns simply because of denotation. It seems like you are asserting, "Communism, by definition, is an economic system, so therefore, in practice, it has zero to do with social issues." which is wildly unnuanced.
Communism is an economic position.
Social liberalism is uncorrelated.
The existing subjugation of the various oppressed groups is inextricably tied to economics
This is a blatant rejection of the concerns of intersectionality. This helps no one. I don't entirely understand what OP's spiel is getting at, but to think that you can entirely separate class from your identity in regards to things like gender, race, and sexuality is nonsense and a gross oversimplification that eschews real-world concerns simply because of denotation. It seems like you are asserting, "Communism, by definition, is an economic system, so therefore, in practice, it has zero to do with social issues." which is wildly unnuanced.
I know that. This isn't about who is a true commie and who isn't. It's just about who we consider good people and who we consider bad people