The way I honestly see it, there are only 2 probable options
-
Dems win and chuds wig out against the government for no reason despite getting everything they ever wanted, because they are simply subhuman automatons
-
Reps win and chuds do not wig out against the government (and also still get everything they wanted)
IMO pretty much everything between 1 and 2 are the same, except that in 1 the chuds are at least somewhat more preoccupied by the government and inclined to play ''''''roblox''''' with them.
acceleration of the downfall of the gov
That's a weird definition of accelerationism. But ok. No, I would say that Dems are not going to lead to the downfall of the US government more quickly than Republicans. Republicans are more unstable governors and will push a much harsher public response as they pass hyper-reactionary social legislation. The parties are about 95% the same on foreign policy, and the empire has clearly lost its capacity to perpetuate itself, so imperial hegemony is on the way out either way.
it's not about causing accelerationism, it's about managing it properly.
chuds want to kill minorities
if Reps win, they turn "killing minorities" into concrete legislation even more than usual
if Dems win, they still turn "killing minorities" into legislation, but at least the chuds are so braindead that they're violently opposed to the Dems for some reason, and will turn some of their ire from minorities toward the Dems
I replied to you in another comment so maybe we should consolidate this, but that's just not accelerationism. Accelerationism is inherently about causing these things.
If you want a reason to vote Dem, it can just be "they do not actively want to make it illegal to be queer".