post a screenshot of a link aggregator about a story about a study
Because that's what they say and they're just passing it along. The Nature article is dense as dirt and twice as dry. The NYT article is your standard tier Lib bullshit where they pad the word count waxing poetic about what this means philosophically while bending over backwards to convince the readers that no animals were harmed in the making of this zombie.
Its clickbait and it will be treated as clickbait.
I never understood why people do things like post a screenshot of a link aggregator about a story about a study. (Sorry for being a grumpy old man.)
Here's the story: https://nyti.ms/3BGoIPh
Here's the study: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05016-1
Because that's what they say and they're just passing it along. The Nature article is dense as dirt and twice as dry. The NYT article is your standard tier Lib bullshit where they pad the word count waxing poetic about what this means philosophically while bending over backwards to convince the readers that no animals were harmed in the making of this zombie.
Its clickbait and it will be treated as clickbait.