Permanently Deleted

  • JustAnotherCourier [none/use name]
    hexagon
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I never asked about treatment, or cutting edge research. Not once.

    I simply asked for theory, history, or education on how the proposal of letting anyone claim authorship would work. That was not provided. So I provided examples of what I see as shortcomings of the idea of letting anyone claim authorship. I probably took it personally, but it was a real response to an idea that does not work without harming someone I care about.

    Insisting something is a good idea without being able to provide any additional details is well below the bar of the typical conversation here. If they did not want to provide details, or could not - they could have disengaged. I did so once I realized they did not.

    None of this matters, I was talking about stupid jokes on stupid podcasts.

    • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      My point is that the established culture in academia is different to memesharing and exporting a code of conduct designed around protecting careers and effective research to one of people just typing nonsense they stop thinking about in 30 minutes is unreasonable

      • JustAnotherCourier [none/use name]
        hexagon
        ·
        2 years ago

        I did not take the conversation in this direction, the person I responded to did. The poster I was responding to brought up their ideas, legislation, and any other number of topics unrelated to my post.

        It is not comparable, you are right. But I was willing to engage with the ideas brought up in response because I was interested in what they were saying, and they have historically had good insights.