It's clear that a significant number, perhaps a majority, of users here are older millennials. The references to pop culture like movies or tv shows is always things from the 90s and early 2000s. Like referencing 90s Simpsons episodes or posting about video games for the original playstation or sega saturn or whatever. In fact a lot of the music and gaming posts I see are just callbacks to games from childhood.

I know we're all leftists here but I would be very wary of slipping into nostalgia. It's this same sentiment that leads the right wing chuds to say "things were better back in the good old days" and we're not immune to that sentiment either (though I think we have a better ability to self reflect and resist that urge).

It makes sense now why even the existence of someone like Andrew Tate completely blindsided a ton of ppl here. I'm not saying you should try to "act young" but maybe it'll help to try/watch/listen to new things once in a while. That way you won't seem out of touch to the younger generations.

UPDATE: I noticed a comment asking how to start exploring new stuff. I don't really know where to start, but try checking out this chart (https://i.imgur.com/Z43zfn9.jpg) and notice where you started to lose touch. It's more of a childhood shows/movies chart but it could be used as a stepping stone to relate to different gens. This could also apply backwards in time as well and you could notice where you stopped being able to connect with older generations as well. If there's some kind of chart showcasing adult media from different generations please let me know.

  • waterfox [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Star Trek: TOS? The Simpsons Season 1-8? Looney Tunes?

    Yes these are all actually good.

    You can draw a line between entertainment that was made to entertain, and entertainment that was deliberately made to create merchandising opportunities. There's a huge difference between Looney Tunes, which was just cartoons which were (much) later adapted into theme parks and such, and He-Man and Transformers which were built from the ground up as a promotional show for a line of children's toys.

    "For me, "hobbyist" refers not esthetics so much as origin. That is, whence did game X or module Y come? Was it created to fill a slot in a production schedule or did it arise out of play? That's the big difference between, say, Gygax's Giants-Drow series and the Dragonlance modules. The former were professional write-ups of adventures based in actual play, whereas Dragonlance was conceived from start to finish as an effort to sell modules. Certainly Dragonlance borrowed elements from adventures and campaigns that were actually played (like Jeff Grubb's deities), but there was no such thing as a Dragonlance campaign prior to its being written up for sale, unlike nearly adventure Gary Gygax wrote during his time at TSR."

    -- James Maliszewski, Grognardia.blogspot.com

    • JuneFall [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yes these are all actually good.

      I would like to argue they aren't mostly. The amount of racism, colonialism apologia etc. in Star Trek is absurd. Stuff is often not progressive or emancipatory. I feel that got worse and better, worse for most of media and better for some. Seems representation and a diverse channel to connect to consumers does that to you.

      That said, feel free to enjoy your treats.

      • waterfox [none/use name]
        ·
        2 years ago

        The first TV series to feature an interracial kiss just isn't good enough. You heard it here, kids.

        Did you hear Mark Hamill liked a tweet by JK Rowling? He's not good enough either! It's an endless purity spiral with no end.

        • JuneFall [none/use name]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Stuff can be enjoyable without being good. Having PoC is good for the west, but it is laughable for billions of people. Not every critique or judgement is Christian purity testing.