On March 15, 44 B.C.E., Julius Caesar was stabbed to death in Rome, Italy. Caesar was the dictator of the Roman Republic, and his assassins were Roman senators, fellow politicians who helped shape Roman policy and government.

Military Success & Reforms

Gaius Julius Caesar had returned to Rome in triumph, hailed as a hero. During his time as a Roman general, he claimed to have killed almost two million people in fifty decisive battles. Although loved by the citizens of Rome, he caused, in many ways, worry among those in the Roman Senate - especially the old elite, the Optimates. The man who was soon to be hailed as dictator for life (dictator perpetuo) transferred his skill as a military commander into the ability to lead the Republic. Seeing the need and demonstrating that he truly loved the people of Rome, he decreed a number of significant and necessary reforms - reforms that further endeared him to the Roman citizenry.

While these reforms made him popular among the commoners, they brought panic to many of his enemies and even some of his friends. To these men, their beloved republic no longer existed, especially after Caesar was named dictator for life in February 44 BCE - a completely unconstitutional act. They believed they no longer had a voice as Rome was quickly coming under the control of a would-be tyrant. Caesar's extreme arrogance and vanity offended many in the Roman Senate.

A Conspiracy Rises

The time had come to save the Republic from this would-be king, and thereby a conspiracy was borne. The four leading men of the conspiracy were an unusual mix of both friends and enemies. The first two men believed they had not been rewarded substantially enough for their service to Caesar: Gaius Trebonius served as a praetor and consul and had fought with Caesar in Spain; Decimus Junius Brutus Albinus was governor of Gaul and had been victorious against the Gauls. The next two conspirators were obviously not friends of Caesar: Gaius Cassius Longinus who had served with both Crassus and Pompey as a naval commander and who some believe conceived the plot, and lastly, the greedy and arrogant Marcus Junius Brutus who had also served under Pompey and who was the brother-in-law of Cassius.

After considerable debate, the final decision was to strike during a session of the Senate at the Theater of Pompey on March 15, 44 BCE, the Ides of March. The attackers had chosen their weapon of choice wisely - a double-edged dagger or pugio of about eight inches long instead of a sword. Daggers were better for close contact and could be hidden under their togas.

The Attack

A large crowd accompanied Caesar on his way to the Senate. The dictator entered and sat on his throne. Mark Antony, who had accompanied Caesar, was conveniently delayed outside by Trebonius, as planned. In the theater, there were 200 senators in attendance along with ten tribunes and a number of slaves and secretaries.

Cimber approached the unsuspecting Caesar and handed him a petition on behalf of his exiled brother; Caesar, of course, did not rise to greet him. Cimber grabbed at Caesar's toga and pulled it back. Caesar reportedly said, "Why, this is violence?" Casca dealt the first blow with his knife; Caesar immediately tried to defend himself by raising his hands to cover his face. The remaining conspirators surrounded the shocked Caesar - Cassius struck him in the face, Decimus to the ribs. Caesar collapsed, dead, ironically at the foot of a statue of his old enemy Pompey.

Aftermath

While the conspiracy had all the makings of a great plan, little attempt was made to prepare for afterwards. The conspirators made their way to Capitoline Hill and the Temple of Jupiter. Brutus spoke from a platform at the foot of the hill, trying in vain to calm the crowd.

Brutus believed the death of Caesar would bring a return of the old Roman spirit; unfortunately, the city was in shock, and people became increasingly more hostile. On March 17 the Senate sought a compromise with the urging of Mark Antony: While the laws of Caesar would remain intact, there would be amnesty for the conspirators. Unfortunately, peace was impossible and the conspirators fled Rome and would all ultimately meet their end.

For Rome, the young Octavian, the adopted son of Caesar, received not only his war chest but also the support of the army. A final conflict between Mark Antony (with the help of Cleopatra) and Octavian would bring Octavian to power as Augustus, the first emperor of the Roman Empire.

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • StalinForTime [comrade/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I'd actually frame it the other way around, namely that Trump might be inept as a political operator except as a demagogue (yanks around here at least seem to think that he's way better at this than Desantis), but it's the people around him that matter. The Trump regime wasn't just Trump but the far-right republicans who rallied around him to increase their power within the state.

    If Trump gets in again I'm not convinced that the people around him won't be equally as ideological fascistic and compentent. as Desantis. Like Pence, Pompeo and Bolton were no idiots. Again, he can pack courts even further, further wield executive authority in a reactionary way, pass demonic legislation at not only a state but a federal level if they win the Congress, and the broad far-right will feel, and be, even more empowered.

    Also people seem to have forgotten Suleimani's assassination, a clear imperialist attempt to goad Iran into open military conflict, and as we know, fascism is intimately linked to imperialism. As Putin repeats in his interviews, presidents change, but the officialdon and its interests and preferred policies stay the same, so I think there would be sufficient fascist momentum both within the bureaucracy and from the Republican party (especially if the Christo-fascist evangelicals support him and the neocons fall in line). I don't think a Trump government is going to lack for competent fascists.

    I could be wrong, but I think when we focus so much on Trump we can slip into 'Great-Man' theory (which i'm guilty of as well).

    All I'm saying is that I personally think they'd be equally fucked up, especially if you're a racial minority or LGBT.

    • Llituro [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      ok, definitely fair. i suppose i would still give a slight edge to desantis simply due to trump's narcissistic penchant for fucking up the well-greased wheels.

      • StalinForTime [comrade/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yh I know that, at least on my end, there's a kind of morbid fascination with Trump, partly because it really can be funny how insanely ridiculous he is, that means that I feel the temptation to join in with the semin-ironic championing of him over Desantis. But yh at the end of the day Trump also mass murdered people through COVID negligeance, did a bunch of fascist shit, and we know how he behaves around women. I'll still indulge the 'our big wet beautiful orange boi' cos its jokes but in more lucid moments I gotta remind myself I'd put them roughly equally low down in hell.