The General Strike was the most significant British labour dispute of the twentieth century. It was a huge solidarity action in support of the miners' union.

The mines had been taken under government control during the First World War but were handed back to private ownership once the War ended. The miners were locked out and forced back to work after three months on strike protesting against wage cuts.

In June 1925 the mine-owners announced that they were going again to cut wages, and also to increase hours. The Trades Union Congress (TUC) offered its support to the miners' union the Miners' Federation of Great Britain, including strike action. Faced with a simultaneous mining and transport strike which it felt it could not defeat at this point, the Tory government offered a subsidy to the mining industry to maintain wages for a further nine months. It used the time gained to make extensive preparations.

Negotiations between the miners and mine-owners failed and with 800,000 coal miners locked out, the General Strike began on 3 May 1926. The TUC limited participants to railwaymen, transport workers, printers, dockers, ironworkers and steelworkers. The immediate and overwhelming response from the working class surprised both the TUC and the Government. 1.7 million workers went on strike especially in transport, bringing transport systems to a halt, and heavy industry, while newspapers were not printed.

The government had prepared for the strike over a period of nine months during which it provided a subsidy to the mine-owners. Using the Emergency Powers Act 1920 it set up the Organisation for Maintenance of Supplies. The authorities used volunteers (middle class university students etc) to run trains and buses and sent in troops to move supplies from the London docks. There were clashes between police and crowds in many areas and at least 4,000 strikers were arrested. There were attacks on buses and trains, including the derailing of the Flying Scotsman.

The strike was called off unilaterally by the TUC on 12 May with no guarantees of fair treatment for the miners - who fought on to bitter defeat in October.

Aftermath

The 1927 Trades Disputes and Trade Unions Act forbade sympathetic strikes and mass picketing. Trade union members had to contract in to the political levy. Civil Service unions were forbidden to affiliate to the TUC

The miners held out for a while but were starved back to work. Some were victimised and remained unemployed for many years.

The strike had little impact on trade union activity or industrial relations. Locally, many working people felt empowered by an experience which changed their outlook on the world and radicalised them.

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes struggle sessions over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can go here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

    • Vida [she/her,ze/hir]
      ·
      1 year ago

      nope. I know a bunch of people who do that, and sometimes I do too. It goes without saying but try to make sure everyone you're around is chill with it :hexbear-gay-pride:

    • Comp4 [she/her]
      ·
      1 year ago

      I dont think so. Some slurs have been reclaimed by minorities.

    • Azarova [they/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. Queer was a slur (though still is to certain parts of older generations) and it's fairly common among the community now. This stuff has been going on for over a hundred years at the least. The German term schwul has a history of being reclaimed, for example.

      [Schwul] was also associated with criminality, and one 1847 publication by a former Berlin police commissioner [...] defined a Schwuler as a crook "who loves certain immoralities." Despite this perjorative association, the word was also adopted by self-identified homosexuals.

      Although the written documentation is somewhat obscure, the term clearly had neutral or even positive connotations by the 1920s for younger homosexuals, who commonly described themselves and each other as schwul. It appears as well that there was something of a generational divide. Historian Manfred Herzer recounts in his biography of the pioneering sexologist and homosexual rights activist Magnus Hirschfeld how Hirschfeld chided a homosexual youth for using the word, although it was clearly a feature of the young man's Berlin dialect.

      Source is the introduction to Gay Berlin by Robert Beachy.