Okay, Marx was a smart guy but was also a dipshit loser that took a bunch of his primary sources on precolonial society from white supremacist settler colonialists with a fetishism for the "noble savage"
He arrived at correct conclusions because the model he was building was scientifically sound but a lot of the individual sources he used were western chauvinists at best.
Hell. he thought the people of eastern Europe and the imperial periphery were too backwards and reactionary to have a revolution before the more erudite and "enlightened" western proletariat.
You keep calling everything bad "beta". Kinda cringe just sayin.
It's funny. My Chinese friend called Japan "feminine." Which is cringier? Choose.
Neither, both are cringe and you both should feel bad.
I feel bad 24/7 365
Yeah so do I but I don't use it as an excuse to parrot cringe reactionary 4chan shit.
Okay so I'm going to rearrange my entire language at some point and maintain brevity. Haven't figured it out yet because I'm lazy
You cannot talk about the world without being cringe. The world is cringe.
You like sub/dom language? Mega-cringe. Dichotomies are cringe.
Order/entropy is acceptable. As is dead/alive, bourgeois/proletarian, father/mother, etc. All variations of a rule.
You're avoiding the point that you consistently use very sus talking points and language.
Instead of getting defensive get to some self crit.
Please do some me crit. Faster that way and you may help yourself in the process.
Actually go do some Marx/Engels crit. I'm just a dipshit loser on the internet.
I have done some serious self crit and like it or not, I'm still alive and posting.
I am very well aware.
Hell yeah. Now write about Marx.
None of us have anything better to do. Otherwise we wouldn't be posting.
Okay, Marx was a smart guy but was also a dipshit loser that took a bunch of his primary sources on precolonial society from white supremacist settler colonialists with a fetishism for the "noble savage"
He arrived at correct conclusions because the model he was building was scientifically sound but a lot of the individual sources he used were western chauvinists at best.
Hell. he thought the people of eastern Europe and the imperial periphery were too backwards and reactionary to have a revolution before the more erudite and "enlightened" western proletariat.
Good. Many such cases. I think Marx had daddy issues and Schopenhauer had mummy issues
You can talk about bad things without replicating bad things. Imagine if someone said
You do not need to speak about reactionary topics in a reactionary way, and no amount of self-pity is an out for that.
Okay. I'll filter my speech more and try to joke less here.
:freeze-peach:
So much for it
Bottom text