:posadas: :posad:

  • Kestrel [comrade/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    90% of that article is trying to establish credibility, which I suppose is respectable, but also exhausting

    • TheCaconym [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I've been following the subject for more than a decade and the topic matter is incredibly full of kooks (with some genuine good quality researchers here and there, Vallée for example). That's likely why the article goes to all this trouble.

      And as someone that has followed the subject, it had been clear for a while that:

      • The phenomenon is real
      • It's not intentionally produced by humans / the actions of a state actor or similar
      • It shows behaviour inconsistent with a natural phenomenon

      But I wouldn't have bet at all any sort of "materials" had been recovered by anyone; very little that is genuine credible info tended to suggest it. This new bombshell is either incredible or a gigantic psyop (such psyops most definitely have happened in regards to that subject in the past).

      It doesn't feel like a psyop though. The list of persons vetting for that guy covers more than the usual suspects.

      • space_comrade [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        (with some genuine good quality researchers here and there, Vallée for example)

        I think Vallee is full of shit too tbh, although it's an uninformed opinion based on some excerpts of his books. It seems to me like he too often believes "witness" testimony and then spins his tales of control systems and interdimensial whatnot because really all you can do is make up some Marvel multiverse like lore if you want to piece together every cooky story you've heard. Also the case he based his last book on seems to be a hoax: https://douglasjohnson.ghost.io/crash-story-the-trinity-ufo-crash-hoax/

    • culpritus [any]
      hexagon
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ya, I didn't read through all of it.