The precedence set is kind of insane. The government is now no longer able to act in a way that could *possibly cost a private firm cash. Literally what democracy
Not really. It’s not saying the government can’t cancel student loans, it’s saying the president can’t. Congress has always had control of spending and this just reaffirms that.
It sucks but it’s very expected. Canceling loans always was going to need democrats controlling the senate, house and presidency.
If the chief executive stopped collecting debts there's nothing anyone could do about it. Am I correct? It would be up to the next president to decide if they want to be the assholes. We already have policy options constrained by rightwingers who just say they won't implement or enforce policies they don't like. It would be cool if someone did that for workers.
The precedence set is kind of insane. The government is now no longer able to act in a way that could *possibly cost a private firm cash. Literally what democracy
deleted by creator
Not really. It’s not saying the government can’t cancel student loans, it’s saying the president can’t. Congress has always had control of spending and this just reaffirms that.
It sucks but it’s very expected. Canceling loans always was going to need democrats controlling the senate, house and presidency.
deleted by creator
Lmao, f*ck this bum, taking money from loan shark.
GOSH IF ONLY THEY HAD JUST THAT
and then fucked around and lost their chance
Then the old coot should did it when they had all 3 branch of congress. What a scammer
If the chief executive stopped collecting debts there's nothing anyone could do about it. Am I correct? It would be up to the next president to decide if they want to be the assholes. We already have policy options constrained by rightwingers who just say they won't implement or enforce policies they don't like. It would be cool if someone did that for workers.
This court has already set the precedent that precedent doesn't matter.