• ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    28 days ago

    Isn’t this another instance of “You’re not allowed to make laws specifically targeting one company” like why TikTok is probably gonna win their court case? Or are they relying on the Supreme Court deciding that’s fine with the TikTok one?

      • ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        Yes exactly. Laws exist to serve capital, they’re not going to make an anti-business decision like that. That’s why the constitution says you can’t write a law targeting one company. Because laws exist to serve capital. I will genuinely be shocked if TikTok loses their case

        • itappearsthat [he/him]
          ·
          28 days ago

          The capital they're serving here is domestic tech moguls who are drooling to buy TikTok at forced-sale prices