I am a Linux noobie and have only used Mint for around six months now. While I have definitely learned a lot, I don't have the time to always be doing crazy power user stuff and just want something that works out of the box. While I love Mint, I want to try out other decently easy to use distros as well, specifically not based on Ubuntu, so no Pop OS. Is Manjaro a possibly good distro for me to check out?

  • bjornp_@lemm.ee
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have used it in the past for a few years. I don't think you should. Why?

    • The Manjaro devs are idiots. They have broken the AUR on multiple occasions.
    • Their packages break more often than upstream Arch since you get update bundles which they release. This isn't tested as well as it should and may lead to things breaking.
    • Arch is also easier to install nowadays, if you really want a rolling release distro.

    If you just want something not-Ubuntu and easy to use, I tend to favor Fedora personally.

    • Coldus12@reddthat.com
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree completely.

      As a sidenote: If somebody wants something easy-to-use that is arch-based I'd suggest EndevaourOS.

  • ZephrC@lemm.ee
    ·
    1 year ago

    What even is an unbiased opinion? That doesn't even begin to make sense.

    That being said, my very biased opinion is that it's a great way to install Arch without learning how Arch works so that when it inevitably breaks you don't even know how to ask the right questions.

    • zarkony@lemmy.zip
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree. Not everyone wants to spend the time to completely customize their system. Distros like Manjaro and Endeavor give people a decent "just works" install while still giving them experience with the Arch ecosystem. The forums are usually a good resource, and everything on the arch wiki still applies. It might just be because I had previous linux experience, but I've learned a lot running Manjaro.

      The average person is not going to jump straight into vanilla Arch as their first distro, but after a couple years with Manjaro, they might try it.

      • ZephrC@lemm.ee
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you don't want to spend the time to completely customize your system just don't use an Arch based system. Seriously. Arch has some neat things about it, but it's not the magical be all and end all of distros. If you don't want to use what it's good at use Mint, or Debian, or PopOS, or Ubuntu, or Fedora, or if you want something bleeding edge use OpenSuse Tumbleweed. You don't have to use shitty imitation Arch if you don't want to use Arch. You also don't need experience with Manjaro to use Arch. I jumped straight into Arch after using Mint for years and it was fine. I still use Mint on my laptop and as a backup on my old drive I moved to my new computer just in case I do something stupid in Arch. Mint is great. I just like playing around with completely customizing my system. Why would you want something Arch based if you don't care about the main thing it's actually good at?

        • Coldus12@reddthat.com
          ·
          1 year ago

          To answer your question: AUR. Aur is something that I love about Arch.

          Also please stop gatekeeping. Installing Arch by hand instead of using something like EndevaourOS doesn't mean anything. I used EndevaourOS after using arch simply because it was way faster and easier to configure. It still has all the functionality of arch (since essentially it is arch).

          If you don't want to spend the time to completely customize your system just don't use an Arch based system

          Thats the thing. You can still customize everything and anything. I mean what's stopping you from using a tty and changing things? Also even the installer helps you customize a lot of things...

          • ZephrC@lemm.ee
            ·
            1 year ago

            I'm not gatekeeping. Arch isn't fucking magical. Do whatever you want. I just actually don't get it. What's the point? I don't even use the AUR. It's not that good. It's an inconsistent mess of janky conflicting build scripts and trust me bro binaries, and you can get basically anything there in almost any distro nowadays. Hell, most of it's on Flathub. You can also customize anything you want on any distro. Arch is just the easiest one to start from a very minimal system and build something up that's totally yours. Why use a distro that only takes that away and adds nothing?

            • Coldus12@reddthat.com
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I agree Arch isn't magical. And I'm more than aware of the issues with the AUR, however i disagree that everything on there can be found by other means. There are several programs (such as optimus-manager for nvidia and integrated video card laptops) which are pretty much only found on the AUR (Not counting Github). Again this is about ease-of-use (Since you could build my example from github as well).

              Obviously you can customize anything anywhere, what sets Arch apart is pacman and aur. And again in the case of Manjaro and EndeavourOS these and the wiki are the main "selling points".

              Arch is just the easiest one to start from a very minimal system and build something up that's totally yours

              Minimal ubuntu and fedora exists as well. And if you were to customise them you'd end up with something that you like as well. But i see what you are saying and i agree.

              • ZephrC@lemm.ee
                ·
                1 year ago

                There are certainly still a few edge cases where the AUR is the least shitty option, and if those apply to you then go for it, but my experience has always been that the more I use it, the worse my experience gets, and everything I need has had better options for a while now, and those edge cases where it even makes sense are rapidly dwindling. But yes, I was exaggerating how bad it is. There are still more than just a few uses for it. EndeavorOS is maybe okay if you want that without having to install Arch, but Manjaro messes with things enough that it's not as compatible with the AUR as it likes to pretend to be.

                And yeah, I agree, there are lots of ways to build up your own system. You can do it with any distro if you're determined enough, and there are other decent options besides just Arch. I just find Arch to be the easiest one to do it with, and I like easy. It's maybe counter-intuitive to say, but I like Arch specifically because it makes the things I want to do easier than any other distro does.

  • LeFantome@programming.dev
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I used to love Manjaro. It looks gorgeous ( to my eye ). Sadly, I now see it as a bit of a low-quality mess with governance issues. Manjaro broke my system more than once. Although I did not believe it when I used Manjaro, getting off of it has shown me that I regularly had AUR compatibility problems as well.

    These days, I would recommend EndevourOS over Manjaro. It is just as easy in practice, I have found it to be far more stable. Once installed, EndevourOS is 99.8% the same as a well configured vanilla Arch. It uses the Arch package repositories natively.

    Even more than Manjaro, I used to love Pamac and graphical package management. Now I think Pamac is garbage. It has caused so many problems for me. I mostly use yay to manage packages now. A really great middle ground between GUI package management and yay or pacman is pacseek. You have to use yay to install it but, for the times I may have missed Pamac, it has been awesome.

  • jman6495@lemmy.ml
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used to run Manjaro, and I can't recommend it for a new user. While the UX is user friendly, the distro itself is not. Ive very often had upgrade and update issues that i have wasted days fixing.

    I'd instead recommend fedora workstation as a non-ubuntu option

    • DNAmaster10@lemmy.sdf.org
      ·
      1 year ago

      Second Fedora workstation. Spent almost an entire year distro hopping to find a distro that worked out the box with my laptops touch screen. Fedora has been the one - super polished too!

  • temptest [any]
    ·
    1 year ago

    How is anyone supposed to have an unbiased opinion?

    What features of Manjaro would make it something you prefer? A different DE? Mint offers more than just one.

  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    ·
    1 year ago

    TBH, if you don't have bleeding edge hardware just stay with OPENSUSE Leap, Debian Stable, Linux Mint or LMDE. If you are feeling adventurous, even Slackware will cover your back most of the time and gives you more bragging rights than Arch. Even if you have bleeding edge hardware, you are better off with OpenSUSE Tumbleweed, Fedora and Arch.

    Manjaro is just not that stable. It once was the only way to install an Arch-ish system without having to go through the hassle of the official Arch installation guide, but currently there are several options to avoid this guide and still have a vanilla Arch system. That's how I used Manjaro for a brief period. The tools I remember they provide, or even better alternatives, are in the Arch User Repo (AUR) anyway, available for all Arch-like distro users. Maybe the only exception to this is the wide catalog of kernels that Manjaro provides, but an equally extensive catalog is available for Arch users through official and third-party repos and the AUR.

    Manjaro is not quite exciting but also not quite stable. I think it's a distro most people get by accident.

  • s20@lemmy.ml
    ·
    1 year ago

    I'm not a fan for a few reasons, but they're all on my end.

    I will say, though, that if you "don't have time to always be doing crazy power user stuff," an Arch based distro might not be what you're looking for. This is especially true of an Arch based distro that strays pretty far from the core distribution.

    My suggestion would be to try Fedora or OpenSuse Tumbleweed instead. I'm a big Fedora fan, and it's honestly great - much better than Ubuntu IMHO. It's also easy to maintain and less prone to user-induced breakage than Arch distros.

    If you're looking for something even more different, but still not prone to breakage, then you might try looking into an immutable distro. Silverblue, OpenSuse Aeon, blendOS, or VanillaOS are all nice places to start looking.

  • nieceandtows@programming.dev
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used manjaro for a long while before I distro hopped and I think it’s a fine distro. Never had any problems with it. People keep pointing to the couple of times when it had some certificate issues. I don’t think it’s very relevant, and I only had positive things to say while I was using it.

  • sovietknuckles [they/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Manjaro is training wheels except when it's time to take them off you realize they're super-glued in place

  • air_filter@lemm.ee
    ·
    1 year ago

    I've had more success with Manjaro than any other distro. I've gotten lots of software working because of the great package manager, all using a GUI. I think it's really easy to use and at the same time really flexible and powerful. I've tried to install Arch twice and failed both times. I guess I'm an idiot. Manjaro is easy to install and you get all the power a flexibility of Arch's package management.

  • radau@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    ·
    1 year ago

    Flawless on my thinkpad T480, occasionaly some issues on my gaming PC usually nvidia drivers post update but not as much lately

  • foobarijk@lemmy.ml
    ·
    1 year ago

    I've installed Arch, Arcos and Manjaro (from the Arch based distros). Manjaro and Arcos are faster and easier to install and setup compared to Arch. Manjaro has nice GUI to select kernel, GPU drivers and install software (and does not automatically move you to the newest kernel, as opposed to Arch or Arcos). They had fucked up (I think 3 times) with renewing their SSL certificate, and for a short while their ISOs were unverifiable (not that big of an issue if you ask me). Since they delay their packages' updates, running them in testing for a few months for extra stability, installing from AUR is bound to break.

    I've installed Manjaro on 3 computers, and worked with it extensively for about 3 years. It's a decent distro that doesn't deserve all the hate it gets.