ZephrC

So we're calling just doing one thing "trauma-driven-development" now? Yeah, Wayland doesn't do everything Xorg does. That's a good thing. Xorg is a dying, dysfunctional mess because it does a thousand different totally unrelated things and nobody understands all of them and how they're all tied together. We're probably going to run into the same problem again eventually with systemd. Feature creep is toxic for open source software.

Wayland has problems, but not being X12 isn't one of them.

Fair.

Fedora has always been where Red Hat goes to force the adoption of not quite finished software. If you are not okay with that, you shouldn't be using Fedora. This is not the first time they've done it, and it won't be the last.

Every country can have some years that are better than others. That's just the nature of reality. Socialist countries don't generally have recessions the same way capitalist ones do because capitalists can exploit them to increase their wealth at the expense of everyone else, so they've stopped being a bug and become a feature.

I don't think either side will be able to decisively beat the other, but that's not how these things usually end anyway.

Actually, I think it's pretty funny in a sad sort of way that Americans don't get how this is going to go. It's really obvious that Ukraine doesn't need to win, they just need to keep fighting until Russia goes home. Western aid isn't even really making much of a difference in the eventual outcome of the war, it's just reducing the damage that Russia is doing to Ukraine and bring that inevitable end closer faster. We've seen over, and over, and over again that once a group of people actually make up their minds to resist, there is nothing that can stop them. Even if the aggressor can bring overwhelming military superiority they will eventually give up and go home, and Russia can't even do that.

The question isn't who will win. The question is how many war crimes will Putin commit before admitting he lost this war in the second week.

I get that Windows is kinda boring, but it's still like a thousand times more interesting and customizable than anything Apple makes. I find the whole Apple aesthetic to be painfully boring and restrictive. I get that it's more fashionable or whatever. I just hate it.

What? They're greedy humans who are doing things that have terrible consequences out of selfishness, not mustache twirling cartoon villains out to destroy the world for destruction's sake. I'm sure every single billionaire in the world has done something good at some point. That doesn't justify the kind of wealth disparity that makes their existence possible though.

I'm in the middle of playthrough #3, and I'm at 8.

Yes and no. You can get amazing pizza just as good as a proper pizza oven with a pizza steel or a pizza stone if you know what you're doing and have a good oven, but again there are subtle differences that make it so you can't just replace one for a large pizza oven with no other adjustments and still get the exact same results.

Yeah, I had a brainfart there. They're pronounced the same, but the company I was actually thinking of is spelled Sysco.

I worked at a pizza place that shut down, and it never even occurred to anyone. For one thing the owner was obviously stressed out worrying about a bunch of other things, both in the restaurant and in her personal life, and you'd be surprised how much of the food you get at restaurants is really just purchased from a company like Cisco and warmed up for you. We did make the actual pizza from scratch though, and that place had the best crust of any pizza place I've ever been too. The problem there was that the recipe was very simple. Just flour, water, oil, salt, sugar, and yeast. That's it. The trick is the exact ratio, and a proper pizza oven. The oven a recipe can't help with, and for reasons I don't understand scaling down recipes, especially in baking, does not produce the same result. A recipe that starts with a 50 pound bag of flour is useless to you, and if you just try to divide all the weights by 100 the end result just isn't good. All you really know is that you can make good pizza dough with flour, water, oil, salt, sugar, and yeast. That is not exactly shocking news.

For your second point, you can do that without worrying about canon. In fact it's easier if you don't.

For the first one, that can be interesting for a single coherent work with a single writer or team of writers that planned out at least an outline of a story beforehand, but there are rarely questions about canon for those kinds of stories. For something worked on for over half a century by hundreds if not thousands of people many of whom have very different visions for what it should all be about, in my experience it just leads to people getting mad at each other based on which of those visions they like more, and lots of self-contradictory nonsense crammed into the story to try and make it all work. That is just my opinion though. You are free to like different things than I do.

I've never personally understood why people get so obsessed with which works of fiction are more real. It's just a silly thing to worry about.

Clearly the solution is to get a second password manager to manage your password manager password for you.

There are certainly still a few edge cases where the AUR is the least shitty option, and if those apply to you then go for it, but my experience has always been that the more I use it, the worse my experience gets, and everything I need has had better options for a while now, and those edge cases where it even makes sense are rapidly dwindling. But yes, I was exaggerating how bad it is. There are still more than just a few uses for it. EndeavorOS is maybe okay if you want that without having to install Arch, but Manjaro messes with things enough that it's not as compatible with the AUR as it likes to pretend to be.

And yeah, I agree, there are lots of ways to build up your own system. You can do it with any distro if you're determined enough, and there are other decent options besides just Arch. I just find Arch to be the easiest one to do it with, and I like easy. It's maybe counter-intuitive to say, but I like Arch specifically because it makes the things I want to do easier than any other distro does.

If there's nothing between you and an object you can feel it at a distance. Texture is a little dulled, and some textures are easier to feel than others, but there's also a whole second kind of texture that we call color. As light gets dimmer it gets harder to feel the difference between those textures, and it gets harder to feel the distance to things, until there is nothing left but a single all encompassing flat texture at a single unknowable distance which we call dark.

Also, some objects only partially block your ability to feel what's behind them, and things like windows are designed to be so easy to feel through that it's hard to feel them at all. Unless they get dirty. Then you can feel the dirt on them.

I'm not gatekeeping. Arch isn't fucking magical. Do whatever you want. I just actually don't get it. What's the point? I don't even use the AUR. It's not that good. It's an inconsistent mess of janky conflicting build scripts and trust me bro binaries, and you can get basically anything there in almost any distro nowadays. Hell, most of it's on Flathub. You can also customize anything you want on any distro. Arch is just the easiest one to start from a very minimal system and build something up that's totally yours. Why use a distro that only takes that away and adds nothing?

If you don't want to spend the time to completely customize your system just don't use an Arch based system. Seriously. Arch has some neat things about it, but it's not the magical be all and end all of distros. If you don't want to use what it's good at use Mint, or Debian, or PopOS, or Ubuntu, or Fedora, or if you want something bleeding edge use OpenSuse Tumbleweed. You don't have to use shitty imitation Arch if you don't want to use Arch. You also don't need experience with Manjaro to use Arch. I jumped straight into Arch after using Mint for years and it was fine. I still use Mint on my laptop and as a backup on my old drive I moved to my new computer just in case I do something stupid in Arch. Mint is great. I just like playing around with completely customizing my system. Why would you want something Arch based if you don't care about the main thing it's actually good at?

What even is an unbiased opinion? That doesn't even begin to make sense.

That being said, my very biased opinion is that it's a great way to install Arch without learning how Arch works so that when it inevitably breaks you don't even know how to ask the right questions.

I support any country's right to not be conquered by capitalist, imperialist oligarchs whether I like their internal politics or not. I hate it when the US does it, so it would be hypocritical to not hate it when Russia does the same thing.