• 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml
    cake
    ·
    1 year ago

    you actually want to convince people you need to make the information accessible and give people a reason why they should believe it over their normally acceptable sources. Making fun of them is probably counter-productive (even if it is fun).

    Says an "anarchist"

    On a post

    About a book

    That's is literally the source of the information in which you say we should be proving.

    You not only have no right to complain about being made fun of and harassed but deserve it. lol

    • Kool_Newt@lemm.ee
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you expect everyone to read your book? How credible is this author? What about this book makes a true understanding of the events accessible rather than just being another person voicing their opinion of evidence the choose to accept?

      • Kuori [she/her]
        ·
        1 year ago

        this is pure JAQing off. you'd have answers to your questions if you spent more time investigating and less time regurgitating state department propaganda

        expecting everyone to do the work for you because you're too lazy is LIB shit

          • Kuori [she/her]
            ·
            1 year ago

            y'all are doing god's work out there comrade. even if no known substance can pierce their ultradense skulls you might still catch someone who can be saved, and that's worthwhile

      • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]
        ·
        1 year ago

        bro, just go read the book, or at least parts of it and skim for quotes to smack us down with, if its really that flimsy fucking get us for it!

        "I could beat you up if I wanted to but I don't so I won't waaaaaaaa"