• Asafum@feddit.nl
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Seriously though, if crabs used currency this would never happen. There would be one crab with all the shells and the other crabs would have to bring food offerings or whatever their currency would be in order to get one.

  • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
    ·
    4 months ago

    Seems more analogous to clothes than housing --- clothes can be "too big" in the sense that the extra size is detrimental to the function, which is somewhat different from houses.

    And it's pretty common to have buy-nothing groups in cities or even at large companies. Got a loooot of hand-me-down clothes for my toddler from friends, family, and randos in the neighborhood.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes and no. I'm sure there is an argument to be made that a house can be too big. Bigger houses require more maintenance, cleaning, higher taxes. Downsizing a house is also a retirement strategy.

  • halvar@lemm.ee
    ·
    4 months ago

    An animal named a hermit crab has better social relationships than humans I'm so pissed.

  • booty [he/him]
    ·
    4 months ago

    You know I've never quite bought the hermit crab shells = houses analogy. They seem much more analogous to armor.

    • BobQuixote@discuss.online
      ·
      4 months ago

      Sometimes matches would be arranged in triangles or other more complex shapes, but since everybody involved needed to get on the same page this was rare.

      A web service could handle this neatly. You could commit to being ready for a match within the next 2 weeks. If the server can find a way to move any number of people between equivalent apartments, everyone gets notified and confirms receipt.

  • glaber@lemm.ee
    ·
    4 months ago

    That's similar to how it works in Singapore, where housing is fully public