🇵🇸 Free Palestine 🇵🇸@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoUS and Japan could develop hypersonic missile interceptors togetherexternal-linkmessage-square13 fedilinkarrow-up177
arrow-up177external-linkUS and Japan could develop hypersonic missile interceptors together🇵🇸 Free Palestine 🇵🇸@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square13 Commentsfedilink
minus-squareThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]hexbear11·1 year agoIt is easier to intercept an intercontinental ballistic missile and the US still doesn't have ICBM interception technology. Good luck. link
minus-squareoatscoop@midwest.socialhexbear2·edit-21 year agoExcept ... they do. Since 2020 I'm not saying in actual use it's reliable, but then again that's true of every country's ICBC interception capabilities. Missile guidance tech is one of the things the USA has an edge in. linkfedilink
minus-squareThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]hexbear5·1 year agoIt isnt reliable. That's the point. Also, note that it isn't for ICBMs, but short and mid range BMs. link
minus-squareWheeze@programming.devhexbear1·1 year agoWhat? USA has been able to do that for decades linkfedilink
minus-squareThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]hexbear2·1 year agoNot reliably. If it was reliable at any point the US would have used nukes on someone else by now. link
It is easier to intercept an intercontinental ballistic missile and the US still doesn't have ICBM interception technology.
Good luck.
Except ... they do. Since 2020
I'm not saying in actual use it's reliable, but then again that's true of every country's ICBC interception capabilities. Missile guidance tech is one of the things the USA has an edge in.
It isnt reliable. That's the point. Also, note that it isn't for ICBMs, but short and mid range BMs.
deleted by creator
What? USA has been able to do that for decades
Not reliably. If it was reliable at any point the US would have used nukes on someone else by now.