I don't like being referred to as a "person with autism". I can't just set it down, it's not something I can remove. It is fundamental to the way I interact with the world, right down to how stim enters my brain. If my brain has types of inputs no allistic person can even approach, and methods of processing inherently different, it is an existence no allistic person can reach. There is no version of me that is not autistic.

A "cure" is the same as shooting me and replacing me with someone else.

The type of person I am is autistic. I am autistic.

I know it is a big trend in leftist spaces to use person first language, but in many situations that just sounds like eugenics to me. Personhood is not some distinct universal experience. There is no “ideal human mind” floating out there in the aether for them to recognize in me.

I get that person first language helps some people recognize that thoughts happen behind my eyes, but if the only way they can do that is by imagining I’m them, I don’t care.

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      deleted by creator

    • GaveUp [she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Not really, it's a more accurate and meaningful term to replace "minority", especially since white minorities in non-white regions can still have white privilege

    • Hexboare [they/them]
      ·
      3 months ago

      I prefer non-White because that's what the category is really about, defining people in opposition to the political racial ideology of Whiteness