.yaml, .toml, etc?

  • pileghoff@programming.dev
    ·
    1 year ago

    I usually use Json5. It's JSON, but with all the weird quirks fixed (comments added, you can use hex numbers, you can have trailing commas etc.)

    • 10nica [comrade/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh that's interesting. Wonder how many libraries out there support it...

      • kersplort@programming.dev
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don't know if it's actual json5, but eslint and some other libraries use extended, commentable json in their config files.

  • simonced@lemmy.one
    ·
    1 year ago

    A lot of good answers but I would add one note:

    • use a format that supports comments, and JSON is not one of those...
  • spartanatreyu@programming.dev
    ·
    1 year ago

    It depends what you need your configuration file to be:

    Need a well defined easy to understand concrete configuration file?

    • Use .toml. It was made to be both human and computer friendly while taking special attention to avoid the pitfalls commonly found in other configuration files by explicitly stating expected types around commonly confused areas.

    Need a simple to implement configuration file?

    • Use .json. It's famous for being so simple it's creator "discoverer" could define it on a business card.

    Need an abstract configuration file for more complicated setups?

    • Use .ncl. Nickle allows you to define functions so that you can generate/compute the correct configuration by changing a few variables/flags.
  • Andy@programming.dev
    ·
    1 year ago

    https://nestedtext.org/

    It's like yaml but simple, consistent, untyped, and you never need to escape any characters, ever.

    Types and validation aren't going to be great unless they're in the actual code anyway.

  • vrkr@programming.dev
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No reason to go beyond simple key-value format like dotenv or just env variables. If you need more structure then maybe you are confusing configuration with state and this is not really the same thing.

  • philm@programming.dev
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Depends on what you mean exactly with "file format".

    If declarative functional programming falls under that, I think something like Nickel, the already mentioned Dhall or Nix. Though Nix more so for packaging and some kind of system management (NixOS?), it's not easily embeddable into a runtime (your app?). Nickel or Dhall is better for that, as they are built from ground up with that in mind, Nickel is maybe the successor of Nix as it is inspired by Dhall and Nix (one goal is to use Nickel as frontend).

    The reason why I recommend a simple declarative language, is that they are IMHO much better composable as it lets the user hide boilerplate via functions. I almost always feel limited by static configuration formats like yaml, json etc..

  • footfaults [none/use name]
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it's YAML.

    I'm not happy that it's YAML but it's become ubiquitous. Sure, there are lots of other formats that others have mentioned, but I'm sorry most of them are positioned as "it's better than YAML!" and the fact that everyone is mentioning YAML, even if it's about the things it does wrong (and boy does it do things wrong) still means that YAML is on everyone's mind.

  • Edo78@feddit.it
    ·
    1 year ago

    It really depends. I usually prefer json. It's easily understandable from humans and from machines, it doesn't depends on indentation and above everything else I like it very much 🤣