• ddplf@szmer.info
      ·
      1 month ago

      Wait, since when it had not been? Or are you telling me that vastly the fastest growing platform in history with multiple payment gates (subscriptions, pay per token, licensing etc.) was not profitable for some reason?

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not sure if you are joking but... it does not appear to be making anywhere near the amount of money that has been invested in it.

        It costs a stupendous amount of money to develop the models, to train them, to rent out or just buy the hardware needed to do this, to pay for the electrical power to do this.

        • ddplf@szmer.info
          ·
          1 month ago

          Not joking, I'm just underinformed

          Now that I think of it, yeah, it makes absolute sense. It's not a stable income OpenAI is based on, but rather the endless wagons of money from hyped up sponsors. Very much unsustainable.

        • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          The cost is to the whole world, because they consume enormous amounts of energy and produce essentially nothing. Like bitcoin miners.

          • TheDoctor [they/them]
            ·
            1 month ago

            Worse than Bitcoin miners, AI seems to have the wholethroated support of capital (rather than a single faction), who see it as the next big form of automation

      • facow [he/him, any]
        ·
        1 month ago

        Or are you telling me that vastly the fastest growing platform in history with multiple payment gates (subscriptions, pay per token, licensing etc.) was not profitable

        Are you not aware that 99 times out of 100 if you see a tech company rapidly growing it's completely unprofitable and not even attempting to be profitable yet? It's called blitzscaling and is pretty clearly what openai is attempting. Like if you see a tech company quickly growing you should be assuming it's unprofitable until proven otherwise not the opposite lol.