• volkvulture [none/use name]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    "First investigation group

    In April 1981, an investigation group of over 20 people was formed under the arrangement of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, the General Office of the Chinese Communist Party, the Organization Department of the Chinese Communist Party, the Ministry of Public Security, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate.[1]

    In June 1981, the investigation concluded that the death toll was over 100,000, while some officials and civilians claimed privately that the death toll was 150,000, 200,000 or even 500,000.[2][4][1] In addition, Qiao Xiaoguang reported to the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection that the death toll was 70,400.[1]"

    Definitely Dengist revision and sensationalism lol

    Yes there was factionalism during the CR and into the 1970s, but read closely here, and you will see similarities between these sort of claims and anti-CPC sectarians like Falun Dafa saying the same shit... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Black_Categories seems like individuals who were most targeted during CR (which also happened to be intellectuals & landowners & influential party figures) were the ones recounting the history afterward & conducting T&R investigations decades later

    • Necco [any]
      hexagon
      ·
      4 years ago

      are you saying they weren't eating people, or just that they were eating less people

      • volkvulture [none/use name]
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        I am wondering where the evidence & primary source info from the time is... lots of bad faith unsupported "reporting" about CPC harvesting organs & doing blood magic exists even today... Falun Gong idiots constantly harp on this. But where is the physical and documentary evidence that didn't conveniently surface in the Dengist reform period?

        • Necco [any]
          hexagon
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          In 1995, Donald S. Sutton, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University, wrote in his research paper, "Did cannibalism actually take place in Wuxuan?......That the incident truly occurred was independently confirmed by a recent visitor to Wuxuan, the scholar and journalist, John Gittings. An off-duty local clerk spoke airily of the killings and the cannibalism-obligingly writing down his name and address when asked-and added with a touch of pride, "In Wuxuan . . . we ate more people than anywhere else in China" (The Guardian, November 27, 1993)."

          Not trying to be belligerent but the idea of mass cannibalism during the revolution has me fucked up

          • volkvulture [none/use name]
            ·
            edit-2
            4 years ago

            Like I said, are there any reports or primary source information that emerged during the 1960s? These commissions during the Dengist reform period are called "Demaoization", of course evidence & claims were made up in the early 1980s to demonize those leftists & attempt making a mockery of the CR in the official national memory... 15 years after the fact

            "Some have suggested that the cannibalism can be explained by “traditions” of the “minorities” in the region, but at least one writer rejects such analysis as nothing more than “Han chauvinism.”31 Nor can it be argued that communism impelled them to it: in the equally politicized environment of the KMT’s persecution of suspected “spies” and “enemy agents” in China before 1949, agents and torturers of spymaster Dai Li on occasion also consumed parts of their victims.32

            Though it persisted in some areas as late as 1971, as a nationwide movement the cleansing of the class ranks generally wound down during the winter of 1968–69. By then, even Mao appears to have felt that perhaps it had gone too far. In Zhongfa [1968] 170, addressed to revolutionary and military control commit- tees all over China, he noted: “Among those who have committed capitalist- roader errors, the arch-unrepentant ones are only a minority, while those who are capable of accepting education and of correcting their errors are a majority. Hence you should not automatically assume that all of those referred to as ‘capitalist roaders’ are bad persons.”33 Later, at the CCP’s Ninth Congress in April 1969, Mao specifically criticized the handling of the movement at Peking Uni- versity. Out of 10,000 students and staff, 900 apparently had been arrested by the PLA’s 63rd Corps, whose officers and men had been sent to the campus “to pro- vide support to the broad masses of the left.” In Mao’s opinion, “to arrest some 0.1 percent, 0.2 percent, or 0.3 percent is enough. The rest can be set free . . . If they rebel, we can simply arrest them again.”34"

            ("MAO'S LAST REVOLUTION" by R. MacFarquhar & M. Schoehals pg. 259-260)

            So it's not as though there are reports of "mass cannibalism", there were reports that emerged in the 1980s of these things happening on a limited basis in the more rural & culturally backward areas of the SW. And even still, I do not see any sources for this information that emerge before 1981... which means "Demaoization" is the reason for this historiography, not any kind of principled recollection of facts & events as they occurred

            • Necco [any]
              hexagon
              ·
              4 years ago

              In your opinion the people quoted as witnesses in that article are promoting or parroting dengist propoganda?

              • volkvulture [none/use name]
                ·
                4 years ago

                Are you asking whether Deng & the processes of "Demaoization" led to lies being conjured about the GLF & CR? Because I can prove they did

                Hell, even in that "First investigation group" section on the Wiki, the "investigators" are attempting to settle on an ever-increasing number of dead... 100,000 then 150 & 200,000. Even 500,000? And yet it ends by saying ~70,000 were killed. So which is it exactly?

                Going by that sort of dodgy statistical vagueness, it's no wonder that the other references in your Wiki link are trying to make direct comparisons to the Holocaust. That sort of "genocide" competition & ahistorical gamesmanship occurred all throughout the period after the late 1970s when real Holocaust memory began to be promoted more.

                "Demaoization" and its more mendacious attempts at capitalist-roader nonsense & rightism can't be discounted here.

                Find me some reports from the 1960s or even from before 1980, and I will be more keen to take it seriously. But hey, if you're convinced?

                • Necco [any]
                  hexagon
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  No I don't doubt demoization led to the spread of lies regarding the previous regime, I am wondering why in this specific instance you don't consider modern first-hand accounts to be reliable primary sources. Not saying youre wrong, I don't know much about any of this, but I'm trying to learn and i'm curious about your perspective

                  • volkvulture [none/use name]
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 years ago

                    I want primary source information, because that's how context & dimension is given to these sorts of claims. We know the Holocaust happened because there is physical evidence & photos exist of the gas chambers among a mountain of other horrific indisputable context. All of this despite how much NS Germany worked to cover that evidence up & destroy it

                    https://monthlyreview.org/commentary/did-mao-really-kill-millions-in-the-great-leap-forward/

                    Mountains have been moved to ruin Mao's legacy & revise the nature of China's mid-20th century strides in revolutionary political struggle

                    Where are the testimonies of this kind of behavior (outside of claims made about KMT during WWII-era) from before "Demaoization"?