DC last night:
- https://twitter.com/loran076/status/1323907767887867904?s=19
- https://twitter.com/FranceNews24/status/1323917050369245185?s=19
- https://hexbear.net/post/47055
it's more likely in the next few days that the fash will take the streets, especially as trump announces how he will contest the election. after all, chaos is his best bet for getting the powers that be to allow him to retain power without a fight. so don't fucking tell people to stay home. it's absolutely critical that everyone pays attention to what's happening in their own backyards and steps up to engage in appropriate community defense.
the election is just a stage. stop confusing it with the conditions that compel people to act.
beyond the possibility of opportunism and tailism in our own ranks, as you've already addressed, I'm not sure we're doing ourselves favors by hewing too closely to the reformist branding. their M4A platform includes no NHS - though such has been the project of social democrats around the world a full century ago - their GND amounts, in an economic sense, to little more than an infrastructure and jobs program, with no transfer of power to the working class or democratic central planning, etc..
a "yes, and..." approach works better here: yes, M4A is a necessary first step but it only remedies one small aspect of the greater problem with private healthcare - privatized care means profiting on death and human misery; yes, the GND, especially paired with deep cuts to the military budget, is a good first step, but it's the bare minimum as climate change is intrinsically one of capitalism's externalities and the only way to truly head off the coming crisis is by transferring control of key industries to the democratic control of its workers and a return to true public ownership.
the public, by and large, already supports these policies. our focus should be on the faults of capitalism unveiled by the as-yet unsuccessful campaigns to reform its worst ills. in Gramscian terms, just because we haven't been overtly successful in the war of maneuver over the past few years doesn't mean we can't treat it like a victory in the war of position - after all, as you noted, our capacity has grown at least in part due to the organizing required to sustain these fights - and advance our demands to better reflect the new world of accelerating decay we find ourselves in.
(that is, with evictions up, food security down, and no support coming from the state for, at a minimum, months, in the midst of an explicitly abolitionist rebellion, perhaps we should adjust our immediate demands to speak directly to the crisis people find themselves in - I've got some ideas here and I'll share them in a separate post when I get a little time to breath, given the immediate situation on the ground that must be dealt with. there's a discussion I'd really like to have about the proletarianization of the petit-bourgeoisie and the weird potential for shared purposes we find ourselves with due to the stark and blatant nature of the crisis that disappearing class finds themselves in.)
Not sure there are any disagreements from me on this point. I previously mentioned fighting for the "best feasible version" of a given demand in my previous comment, which should certainly involve some form the "yes, and" approach to formulating demands.
Rather than simply calling for M4A, we should call for, at minimum, M4A and an NHS and to place hospitals and pharma companies under public and democratic working-class ownership. Rather than just calling for a GND with a just transition, we should call for an ecosocialist GND with a just transition and to fund it through taxing the rich, shifting money away from the military, and expropriating the GHG-emitting sectors and giving them to the workers to plan a serious climate response. Rather than simply calling for increasing testing/tracing and social distancing like some of the libs are doing, we cut through the false dilemma between public health and immediate economic needs by calling for socially-supported social distancing - not just stimulus checks/temporary UBI, but rent and mortgage freezes for nonessential workers, and dramatic increases in pay (hazard pay!) and increased workplace safety for the essential workers - nothing less than a living wage for those who have to work and a living income for those who can't, calling on the essential workers to use their collective leverage to strike to make the capitalists pay for it all.
We can reach people at their current level of consciousness by using the vulgar/popular/minimalist demands as a starting point, rephrasing them and fleshing them out in this fashion to point people away from reformism and toward the difficult but necessary work of organizing with the goal of socialist revolution in mind.
I'm all ears with respect to the ideas you had in mind, once you have a chance to post again.
agreed on all points and I like this approach. cheers!