Permanently Deleted

          • marxdude69 [none/use name]
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 years ago

            I'm saying that it's not really an interpretation at all since it doesn't quote his works or really discuss them.

              • marxdude69 [none/use name]
                ·
                edit-2
                4 years ago

                Yes, that seems pretty inaccurate to me. To show that it is accurate you need to find quotes to support your assertion. This is not being 'obtuse' - this is the basics of making a properly Marxist analysis.

                  • marxdude69 [none/use name]
                    ·
                    4 years ago

                    It says "mythology of the white proletariat" - i.e. we've been lied to about the history of white workers in USA. You can't seem to find more any evidence for your assertion besides the title of the book - I assume that's where you stopped reading.