Some highlights, he opens with this:

I'm not a right-winger. In fact, I'm further left than most left-wingers. That said, I still understand when things are and are not neutral in point-of-view.

Chuds always snitch on themselves.

Given that [Fascism] is a pejorative, and there is, was, and always be some controversy over it (I'm sure both parties have traits of it), it's the only Wiki article I believe I've personally seen which makes no mention of the associated controversy. Wikipedia generally disallows pejoratives to be used in this manner, and the fact that they are allowing this is something that many people will find shocking on both sides of the spectrum.

Calling chuds Fascist is really like saying the n-word.

There is no factual definition of there term.

We have to scrub all meaning from the word Fascism to distance it from conservatism.

Exactly. That's how fascism works, by controlling mainstream propaganda. It's in the discription. If you only listen to one side you become a proprietor of fascism.

:galaxy-brain:

All I'm asking is for the removal of the concrete far right explanation. It's ignorant to think that only one side can be any one thing.

This is all so fucking good lmao