WhyEssEff [she/her]M to finance • edit-24 years ago*Permanently Deleted*trashexternal-linkmessage-square40 fedilinkarrow-up166file-text
arrow-up166external-link*Permanently Deleted*trashWhyEssEff [she/her]M to finance • edit-24 years agomessage-square40 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareCarlTheRedditor [he/him]hexbear1·4 years agoOK so then where's the line of who the media can report on and who they can't? link
minus-squareDasKarlBarx [he/him,comrade/them]hexbear7·4 years agoI would say if the person's found guilty of whatever they were accused of, if they've doxxed themselves, or I'd they're a public figure. But I'm not media czar and this is pretty half baked. link
minus-squareCarlTheRedditor [he/him]hexbear5·4 years agoFair. I just think that there's a public interest in knowing who DFV is. His actions are indisputably newsworthy and I think that uncovering the identity of people whose actions are newsworthy is a legitimate thing for journalists to do. link
minus-squareDasKarlBarx [he/him,comrade/them]hexbear4·4 years agoYeah I mean this case specifically he doxxed himself. He did a interview with the WSJ and have his name & city so he's out there at this point. I'm just speaking more of media in general. link
OK so then where's the line of who the media can report on and who they can't?
I would say if the person's found guilty of whatever they were accused of, if they've doxxed themselves, or I'd they're a public figure.
But I'm not media czar and this is pretty half baked.
Fair.
I just think that there's a public interest in knowing who DFV is. His actions are indisputably newsworthy and I think that uncovering the identity of people whose actions are newsworthy is a legitimate thing for journalists to do.
Yeah I mean this case specifically he doxxed himself. He did a interview with the WSJ and have his name & city so he's out there at this point.
I'm just speaking more of media in general.