John Reed, born on this day in 1887, was an American journalist, poet, and communist activist. Reed served as a war correspondent, covered strikes, interviewed Pancho Villa, and was an eyewitness to the October Revolution.

Reed was raised in an upper-class environment in the Pacific Northwest during the turn of the 20th century. He graduated from Harvard and showed interest in social issues, attending socialist club meetings. Three years after completing his studies he landed a job with the New York-based leftist magazine The Masses, which published articles by prominent radicals of the time.

As a determined champion of social justice, Reed covered strikes by silk mill workers in New Jersey and coal miners in Colorado. He was then sent to report on the Mexican revolution (1910 - 1920). He was appalled by the exploitation of laborers and Washington’s policy towards Mexico. "The United States Government is really headed toward the policy of ‘civilizing 'em with a Krag’ [a rifle used by American troops] - a process which consists in forcing upon alien races with alien temperaments our own Grand Democratic Institutions: I refer to Trust Government, Unemployment, and Wage Slavery," Reed wrote.

His series on Mexico, later published as a book titled Insurgent Mexico, enforced Reed's reputation as a war correspondent. When World War I broke out in Europe Reed traveled to the Continent on two occasions, resulting in his second book - The War in Eastern Europe.

However, his most famous work - Ten Days That Shook The World - was not about war, but rebellion. It was published in 1919 and described the events of the Russian revolution. Reed visited Russia in August 1917 and witnessed how the Bolsheviks seized power. He welcomed the uprising and was an enthusiastic supporter of the new socialist regime. "So, with the crash of artillery, in the dark, with hatred, and fear, and reckless daring, new Russia was being born," he wrote.

He met the two main leaders of the Bolshevik uprising in person, Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky, and was a big fan of the Bolshevik party. "Instead of being a destructive force, it seems to me that the Bolsheviki were the only party in Russia with a constructive program and the power to impose it on the country," Reed wrote in Ten Days That Shook The World.

The book was also widely praised by the public - even American diplomat George F. Kennan, who had no sympathy towards the Soviets - gave it a positive review: "Reed’s account of the events of that time rises above every other contemporary record for its literary power, its penetration, its command of detail."

Reed subsequently made a trip back to the U.S., where he vehemently defended the new Soviet Republic and was arrested three times, the last for violating the Sedition Act. After being acquitted, Reed returned to the USSR and again met with Lenin and Trotsky.

Reed died from spotted typhus while trying to return to the United States in 1920. He was given a state funeral and buried at the Kremlin Wall Necropolis.

Ten Days that Shook the World USSR

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    go-ahead go ahead give me another hot take. Tell me how going for walks is Bourgeois. Tell me how hiking trails are capitalist alienation.

    Idk what thread I just read, and it had a point vaguely, but it just reads like "of you seek out any joy in this world you're petit bourgeois" which doesn't seem like the most productive use of time.

    • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also apparently when indigenous people went on walks they were like cultivating the land in realtime, nothing weird about thinking that blob-no-thoughts

      Again no ides what they were talking about but it also partly seems like if you enjoy anything without it being productive you're petit bourgeois. Literally becoming left-wing grindset guys

      • HarryLime [any]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Indigenous people invented surfing, a totally useless activity that is pure fun. The idea that they were on their grind 24/7 is nonsense. The San people of Namibia are so good at acquiring food that they have tons of free time to just chill out.

    • 2Password2Remember [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      "bourgeois is when you're happy, and the happier you are, the more bourgeois you are" - Carlos Marcos

      Death to America

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        That's a reflection of current cultural trends and available (and affordable) entertainment. It's not a class thing, except in so far as having a car and gas to go to a hiking trail is a class thing. Folks like walking.

        • Mokey [none/use name]
          ·
          1 year ago

          All the fancy hiking gear is super expensive though, pmcs love wearing arcteryx and rei and shit

          • raven [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thanks to them I can get all that shit at the thrift store for $5 when they pick up hiking to center themselves, then Marie Kondo their wardrobe by that fall garf-troll

            • Frank [he/him, he/him]
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Word. The cool thing about all the fancy technical outdoor clothes is they tend to last forever, especially if the owner is just some yuppie lawyer from Seattle who goes on day hikes once a month. Which means the old stuff from twenty years ago is often just as good as the new stuff. I think my tent is like ~10 years old. My sleeping pad is at least that old. I've got camp knives older than I am. My camp cookwear belonged to one of my ancestors. My hiking hat is a cheap woven straw hat that I also used when I was doing landscaping. I shelled out for one of those fancy jetboil stoves, but I also have a buddy who makes high-efficiency alcohol stoves out of aluminum soda cans that weigh effectively nothing and will out-perform all but the most expensive high-tech camping stoves.

              When the tent gets leaky there are water-proofing sprays that can fix it up to good as new condition. There are patch kits that will fix most damage to inflatable sleeping pads. I can sew, so I can do a lot of repairs to fabric gear. A lot of my camping stuff lives in the back of my car in case I have a break-down and need to overnight while I'm waiting for someone to come get me (this doesn't happen often I'm just paranoid).

          • Frank [he/him, he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            CW: Leather

            Otzi hiked across the alps wearing shoes made from woven grass, lime bast fibers, bear hide, deer hide, and stuffed with straw and fiber for warmth and comfort. Folks who have re-constructed the shoes generally agree they're very comfortable and very good on rough terrain, comparable to any modern technical hiking shoe if not better. If people 5,300 years ago could enjoy fleeing from their enemies only to succumb to death on the icy graveyard of an alpine glacier you can too!

            Seriously, for hiking you need a big, broad brimmed hat of some kind, reasonably light weight pants and a long sleeve shirt, a decent sized bottle for water, some kind of bag for snacks and first aid (splints! DO NOT GO HIKING WITHOUT DUCT TAPE AND A SAM SPLINT!) and comfortable shoes. And somewhere to hike, which admittedly can be hard if you live in dense urban areas, or can't afford transportation. If you want to get really fancy on a budget hit up used sporting good stores and find some cheap ski-poles to use as hiking poles (they look silly but they really do help distribute strain on your body and give you much more stability on steep or rough terrain)

            REI usually has a discount sale once a year where they sell off last year's stock at pretty decent prices. REI gear in general, at least as of a few years ago, tends to be very high quality while being less expensive than prestige brands like Patagonia or Arcteryx. A lot of my camping stuff is ancient REI gear picked up over the decades that still works well. You can also check out the SteepandCheap website, it's an outlet website for some big camping retailer and sells off old stock at pretty steep discounts. Even if you don't camp, if you live in an environment that gets a serious winter picking up some of the wool blend stuff they sell is generally a good idea. Wool is so much fantastically better than cotton, nylon, or polyester in cold or damp weather it's hard to explain with words.

            Of course you can also just get, like, some sturdy shoes and a cheap tent and do just fine most of the time. The really expensive, light weight, high-tech technical stuff only starts to have concrete advantages if you're doing long distance through hikes in remote areas where you won't be able to re-supply and every ounce of gear is going to add up. If you're just doing overnight hikes or day hikes there's no need for any of that stuff.

        • Commiejones [comrade/them, he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think the most expensive part is the time. Poor folk don't have 5 hrs to drive out of town go walk up a mountain for a couple hours and then drive home.