Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]

  • 52 Posts
  • 4.52K Comments
Joined 4 年前
cake
Cake day: 2020年7月30日

help-circle
  • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]tomainYou know who's valid?
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 年前

    I'm sorry homie but his position is indefensible. Go read that shit. He literally thinks that it's better to have fucking rape videos and child pornography be platformed for any amount of time, and to subject workers to viewing said content in order to maximize his fap material. I won't just ignore it because the thread is unrelated.



  • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]tomainYou know who's valid?
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 年前

    Watch this thread as he tries to exonerate himself for being a sex pest. Check out his post history for lots of horny posts. He has tried to paint me as a prude for not wanting cp and nonconsensual porn to have a platform for even a fucking minute. This is the guy who goes to DSA meetings to try and fuck girls and somehow twist it as woke.


  • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]tomainYou know who's valid?
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 年前

    What am I misrepresenting? Did you not lament all your saved videos? Did you not claim that pornhub should hire "moderators" to view potential cp and nonconsensual content so you had maximum fap material?


  • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]tomainYou know who's valid?
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 年前

    Idk if you are trying to say I'm a transphobe, which I'm not, but budo believes that pornhub should preserve his fap material at all costs, including subjecting hundreds of workers to viewing child porn and r*pe videos to more accurately filter content. His motivation is not preserving small independent queer accounts or protecting the livelihoods of small-time sex workers, but his own personal enjoyment (lamenting his "lost saved videos"), and is completely fine with revenge porn, child porn and nonconsensual content being platformed until proven to be non-exploitative by a worker who is forced to view said content.

    He's a sex pest.



  • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]tomemes*Permanently Deleted*
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 年前

    What I did was bring up the unaddressed contradiction of the tendency of large swaths of colonized people and victims of US Imperialism to not yet be accepting of relatively newly accepted social positions of the left wrt neopronouns, and whether or not it is harmful to preemptively label them as "not my comrade". I still think this is something nobody wants to talk about to avoid a shitshow like that thread. The question wasn't "should we ignore how colonized people feel about trans people", it was "should we preemptively write off colonized people that might have reactionary views on trans people." I never once implied that you should be thrown under the bus, just that they shouldn't.

    I will absolutely admit to making cruelly dismissive comments at someone about something I did not understand (deer/doe pronouns) as a reaction to being repeatedly called a transphobe. I was mad at a user specifically because I felt attacked and reacted cruelly. It was wrong and I'm genuinely sorry for invalidating anyone.

    If that bothers you confront your behavior and thoughts about people like me.

    I have reflected and discussed my shitty behavior in that thread with another comrade privately. I let myself react dismissively and hostilely in a way that was meant to hurt someone's feelings and that's wrong. Declaring that I have negative thoughts about trans and gender nonconforming people as a group isn't fair though. I don't.

    Also, the person who wrote a long straw man hypothetical about a refugee camp in Yemen was someone else and I believe they were permanently banned.



  • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]tomain*Permanently Deleted*
    ·
    4 年前

    I've seen his account make trans-positive posts before, like unprompted standalone posts just to say that trans folks are valid, iirc. Seems kinda weird, though I can't see his voting history like admins can.


  • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]tomemes*Permanently Deleted*
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 年前

    This is why I think it should be illegal to be a g*mer. What is it that makes them so cringe? Why is it so hard for them to be good people? The world may never know, but for now there should be repression.









  • The brutality of the 1990s had engrained a stoicism in the population that had mostly died down after WWII. It's something that generally happens in any society that is relentlessly harsh. You get the combination of cynicism and stoicism because you just come to expect bad shit to happen to you.