https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/259/257/342.png
Don't bother arguing with @hexbear, their history books skip the 30s
Anyone not knowing who LeCun has no idea about anything deep learning related.
I've seen more armed military on a single day in Tian'anmen square that in a cumulated 10 days in London, I know hexbear is supposed to be satire but give me a break.
Don't forget the sweaty muscular men!
Pretty sure you could word things similarly for every field that's around. I've yet to find a proper explanation for "software development is not engineering"
La personne qui a appelé a probablement pas pris ses 30k€ d'amendes pour fausse alerte attentat
See, based on what you mean by liberal, I don't know whether that means "the current potus is a dem" or "of course because everyone is a liberal there"
I get and agree with the spirit but "western liberals" doesn't mean anything
OK, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt: can you provide me with any of said link?
If you're talking about the links in the comments I replied to, they all date from this year. This war started more than two years ago, in case you forgot. Did Russia presciently knew Ukraine would bomb them two years beforehand?
"Offensive" was autocorrected to "official"
Russians did not destroy infrastructure because they hope to use for themselves (the fact that I have to explain this makes me think engaging with you is a waste of my time). That's the difference between a war of invasion and the mindless bombing the USA likes to do in whatever conflict they get involve in on the other side if the globe
Typing on phone is annoying, so my messages get a bit terse. But your whole rant previously is about how bad the Ukrainians are. OK, sure. I have not much interest in that. But, how does that justify the Russian attack? How is any of this Ukrainian nenonazi stuff relevant? Russia was never under threat from Ukraine. Even if literal-Hitler was reborn there, how is bombing Kiev helping anyway? Authoritarian governments LOVE wars, it gives them an enemy, it gives them power, it gives them a mean to get rid of political opponents.
So we can either believe Putin a philanthropist ready to sacrifice bravely his troops for no benefit but the de-nazification of a nuke-free, not-in-nato country, or we can recognise this as just a pretext for grabbing land (supported by the preservation of infrastructure). Oh and that part I wrote about authoritarian governments loving war applies to Russia just as well by the way.
After all of this, if Russia is in it for no personal benefit but a moral victory, why are they not withdrawing? After all they have supposedly nothing to gain by continuing the war, since they don't intend to occupy the country?
Such a long post to avoid explaining why the Russian official is justified. Half of what you wrote is in bad faith (not destroying critical infrastructure... Out of good heart? Really?) or simply not relevant (should we invade every fascist government out there? Besides, nothing better to consolidate an authoritarian government than a war, so good job Russia on that front ?)
If we assume the latter, why does that justify the initial Russian offensive ? I keep reading tankies saying Russia was threatened by Ukraine but I never see anything to back that up.
It does make him an American moderate.
Je m'étais fait incendier par des amerlocs pour un commentaire similaire, heureux de voir qu'ici d'autres partagent ce point de vue, et que les bas votes ne pleuvent pas
Obviously NK, Cuba, and Iran are striving...
Anyway, sanctions work not if sanctioned countries struggle, but if they cave in to whatever the USA demands to lift them. Meaning you'd have to look at the countries who are not sanctioned to get an idea of how effective they are. Which is, admittedly, difficult to evaluate
My God is that how Americans write emails ? I would go crazy if I had to write so much to say so little.
Are we supposed to make assumptions about you for being on hexbear?
Moi j'ai surtout aimé cet avœu involontaire: les branleurs de cnews ne sont pas des journalistes, appelez l'arcom!