They blew up this thread with this responses. No way they're for real.

Link: https://hexbear.net/comment/4384113

Show

    • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      10 months ago

      They did take a lot of pride in talking about how much they read from "multiple sources" but also seemed incapable of reading a short pamphlet by MLK after several hours. Or reading their own sources for that matter.

        • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
          ·
          10 months ago

          No, I've seen too many libs dismiss youtube links out of hand without even watching them (even when it is literally a full documentary that is uploaded there). I think it's more like TV and Wikipedia.

      • EnsignRedshirt [he/him]
        ·
        10 months ago

        Multiple sources: “I read the New York Times and the Washington Post.”

      • CthulhusIntern [he/him]
        ·
        10 months ago

        Multiple sources, all of whom paraphrase from AP and Reuters, who in turn, paraphrase their briefings from their CIA handlers.

        But they don't look at any non-western source, because those are all propaganda.

    • Anne_Teefa
      ·
      10 months ago

      Wdym, Harry Potter, Percy Jackson, and hungry games are books. Only people with 200+ IQ can understand such literature, I guess that's why you can't understand such brilliance, another common Hexchanian L

      Le sigh sadness

        • Anne_Teefa
          ·
          10 months ago

          NGL I never read that series or eragon. Read the tears of a tiger series, HP(stopped at goblet of fire because that's all I had), read hunger games, poo poo'd twilight, and idk I think that's it, I remember reading a lot but it was mostly textbooks or dictionaries or

          • kristina [she/her]
            ·
            10 months ago

            I read fantasy slop all the time. I have a special disdain for eragon and hp though