Their thinking was that if you didn't know the names of guns then you couldn't really argue against them because of your lack of knowledge. This obviously doesn't apply to vaccinations, immigration, or universal healthcare
Damn, I wonder what term could specifically refer to a rifle with an intermediate cartridge and controllable automatic firing/suppression? Guess we’ll never know.
Does anyone remember the huge hullabaloo about how "assault rifle" isn't a real term? What was that even about?
People thinking that semantic arguments have ever convinced anyone.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
AR-15 stands for assault rifle 15 sweaty
Their thinking was that if you didn't know the names of guns then you couldn't really argue against them because of your lack of knowledge. This obviously doesn't apply to vaccinations, immigration, or universal healthcare
Damn, I wonder what term could specifically refer to a rifle with an intermediate cartridge and controllable automatic firing/suppression? Guess we’ll never know.
Libs wanted to ban "assault weapons" (assault rifles are already illegal), which is a certain aesthetic guns can have, and banning it is really dumb.
The right rightfully pointed out that it was dumb.
There more substantial argument where libs have a little more ground is on the issue of background checks
Was the Federal Assault Weapons Ban about gun aesthetics? I thought that its repeal had a real effect on the Mexican drug war.