The logs have not yet condemned Hamas, and are therefore antisemitic. You wouldn't believe an inanimat antisemite would you?
you joke but that's actually the narrative they're going with
cw SA
Dershowitz: I want to have a list of all the radical feminists who are pushing hard. I understand that, to get all these names revealed. I want to know, how many of them have ever actually condemned hamas for the rapes
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1742731313105305600/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/i6ghsmJhja-ue7sA.mp4?tag=12
That's a deepfake or something. It's not real. There's no way that's actually a real thing that a real human is doing, this is too cynical, too awful, too inhuman. This would be too on the nose if it were in even the schlokiest hollywood movie. This is something I'd expect to see a full on nazi make as a way to discredit Jewish people.
Has there ever been a single piece of evidence for these rapes they claim to have occurred?
Anyway since they're going with attacking the credibility of the accusers we can basically assume the claim he's mossad is 100% accurate. If it were false they'd attack the evidence itself but they clearly think it's true and that there will be evidence to show it so instead they take the personal credibility approach.
My ballot doesn't have a vote to condemn Hamas on it so liberal democracy is anti semitic and must be destroyed. Sorry I don't make the rules I just follow them!
I saw a clip of Dersh basically saying this. "What about Hamas though?"
actually it's antisemitic to say you can't talk about things because of antisemitism
